That's the trouble with making assumptions with no evidence, Lazarus. It can make you look a little bit silly.
Caps, as ever, I'm very comfortable with the idea that many people think differently from me - and I expounded earlier about the prevalence of cultural Christianity among those who don't believe in the Christian god (you may have missed it, it was when I was 'going on' about the Census again).
However, as I've said numerous times, I don't think the state should take sides. Given the second largest group in the Census was of people who say they have no religion, the state should reconsider its choice to elevate all religions above none in the services we've discussed, and I think the state should remain neutral on issues of religion.
Many people agree - lots of polls, lots of campaigns. Many disagree, which is fine. But I think it's importent to acknowledge that people's reasons for not campaigning on any issue, particularly when it pertains to their children, can be complex, and that lack of activism does not automatically equal endorsement for and support for the status quo.
As ever, I know you think it's beneficial, you know I think it's damaging. We will never, ever agree - and there are many more on both sides if this. On such a polarising issue, I'd prefer our schools to be a neutral space, and leave us to make our own decisions for our children on issues that have no evidence base.