Chandler I don't see the point persisting with this but here goes.
You wrote:
"aggressive and dangerous" towards you, who "barrel" you out of the way, or who "deck" you or others, take a description and go to the police, as you would with any crime.
Please read what I actually wrote, not what you think I wrote. Here it is, reproduced for any avoidance of doubt. I am talking about people running inappropriately quickly on busy footpaths, forcing other pedestrians into evasive action, I don't suggest this is criminal, just rude and potentially dangerous. Please can you point out where I make reference to runners decking people, read the passage below, the key word is not
I am talking about runners who do not alter their pace when they reach a busy footpath and will charge along it at the same pace as before, forcing people to leap out of their way, not wandering around decking people.
If you really have been assaulted Where do I claim to be assaulted? Here's a clue, a really big one: I haven't.
And btw, drop the "strawman" bit - you're using it out of context and sound silly. A "man of straw" is a person with no funds to pay a compensation claim, not an empty argument
I'm sorry, but you clearly misunderstand what a straw man argument is. It refers to purposely misrepresenting someone's statement and then attacking the misrepresentation.
For example:
Person A: 'I think there should be more restrictions on the times alcohol can be sold.'
Person B: 'They tried prohibition in the USA and it failed and it caused organised crime to flourish.'
When Person A, hasn't advocated prohibition at all.
Me: 'I've experienced problems with some runners running aggressively and quickly on busy pavements, causing other people to have to move out of the way, which is anti-social and could be dangerous'
You: 'You hate people taking exercise, I don't believe you when you say runners have assaulted you.'
Is pretty much a straw man argument writ large.