If some feminists didn't want to post once upon a time, didn't want to post when it went quiet and the problem they complain about went away and still don't want to post, then what's the beef?
I don't think there's a fb group call out thing. Not like elsewhere on MN. I think there are people who used to post a lot who still read occasionally and are moved to post on certain threads, but are not part of the daily life of the board anymore. I might feel like posting on rape threads, for example, because I think that sometimes the legal aspect is not being accurately set out, but I'm not interested in the porn & prostitution threads because I've done the polarised bunfight on those issues and I'm not really cut out for it.
As I said, I tried for a long time to be measured and to engage but to no avail. If posters only want to post to disagree, then they'll get what they seek. Surely there is at least one issue on which people can find a common ground with another poster?
I do often wonder who fwr detractors have in mind when they complain about the board. Because both xenia and sgb, for example, are pretty robust in their posting but not sure they are necessarily a natural grouping beyond posting on the same section of MN. And I find the radical feminist nomenclature baffling; it seems like any viewpoint that actual touches on naming the source of a problem gets classed as radical. I don't think that's how it works.