hamiltoes in the interests of accuracy I was explaining that the majority experience is not six weeks of agony.
This is important. If women are in agony, then they need to seek help, not just accept it as inevitable and as a consequence, either give up or struggle on in pain. Can't think why you would disagree with my insistence on this.
Of course the majority of mothers use formula at some point. This is one of the reasons why it should be marketed ethically. It's not just any old consumer product. It's actually the sole source of nutrition from birth for one in five babies, and a major or sole source for many other babies as they grow.
I don't think either breastfeeding or formula should be 'pushed' at mothers. I don't think either should be presented as 'wrong' or 'right', in that sort of judgmental, moralising way.
Formula is certainly pushed. Without legal restrictions on its marketing, it would be pushed even more (see USA, see UK pre law).
Breastfeeding support should not push bf - I don't think nice pics of bf mothers is 'pushing', and an antenatal discussion about why you might want to bf is not pushing either. Women don't often see bf close up if at all, and they are not usually aware of the health impact of infant feeding, so they do need info. This should not mean the mother does not have a free choice.
In fact, I wish infant feeding was a free choice. Too often it's not, as mothers who did not want to ff end up doing so without actually choosing to do it.