itsbetterthanabox Speaking to white people a large quantity will say they are not attracted to those of another race. This is racist pov because it assumes black and asian people are just one homogenous group. How can you know you don't find someone you have never met attractive simply based on their race? Unless you stereotype
Just like you have done, I suppose? I mean, I suppose you have actually questioned a "large quantity of white people" on their personal preferences? In the unlikely event you did, I would commend them on being polite enough to answer you! You didn't, of course, you've just made race-based stereotypical assumptions.
And why does everything have to revolve around who is attracted to whom? I don't lead my whole life based on who fancies me and who doesn't, and spend my time thinking up pointless reasons as to why that might be.
The UK is different from the US, you are right. There is a different proportion of racial mixture. Non-whites are in a minority in the UK. That seems to be reflected in much of the "proof" you discuss. How would you propose getting around this? Making magazines (magazines, FFS!) carry more than the proportion of black people in photographs? Twice as much? Three times?
Don't you think this would stir up racial hatred because of obsessional sensitivity on the part of a few, who cannot help but look at everything in terms of race and sexual attraction, and dissect the appearance of black people for not being black enough and having too "Western" coloured eyes?
Are there not some more important things than bloody magazine pictures? I of course get the important point here, but if you are going to try and have a serious discussion, can you possibly discuss slightly more varied things, such as access to the jobs market?