Background to this is that SIL has been ill and is now rather under weight.
This is not just my opinion, after a recent family gathering, a number expressed concern at how thin she is. She is not anorexic or anything of that nature, she just needs to regain the lost weight now she is recovering.
Today she told me that she often fancies a curry. Home made, not take away. However, if she makes one, her husband complains a lot about the fact that both she and the house smell of spices, which he dislikes. Therefore, even though she is getting over a serious illness, needs to eat and would enjoy a curry, she never makes one.
I said, can he really not accept that you enjoy eating it and just put up with it? Apparently not. DH feels that it is unreasonable of me to suggest that she do something which would cause her husband to be unhappy. I feel that allowing someone who has been very ill to have food that they enjoy while recovering is a fairly basic thing to do. MIL has obviously strongly influenced this attitude. She will not cook certain common foods even though she enjoys them, just because FIL complains if she does. Personally, I buy cheese that my DH won't touch as well as other foods which he dislikes but I love. I don't try to make him eat them but don't see why I can't eat what I wish, paid for by me, in the home which I partly fund and run.
So, am I a harridan for suggesting that an adult tell her husband that she can eat what she wants, as the in laws feel?