Can't work out if this will be good in the long run or if I might cause my ds unnecessary distress.
I have an almost 2 year old and an almost 5 week old. Baby is obviously up through the night for feeding and is very unsettled from around 7 each night so come the morning, I'm tired!
Toddler wakes very early between 5.00 and 6.30; if it's 6.30 I really feel like I've had a lie in.
Anyway the 5.00am starts are tough when I've been up several times with the baby and to be honest I don't enjoy the days with my toddler as I'm totally exhausted.
This morning he woke at 5.00 and I was just too tired to get up. Normally we get up and have a bottle and play etc. I just couldn't face it this morning. We've tried bringing him into our bed but he hates this.
I decided I was going to let him cry for a little while this morning, just needed another 15/20 mins before I could face getting up. I heard him crying in the background but I must've fallen into a deep sleep and I didn't waken until 8.15!
I went straight over to ds room, he was sitting up, looked a little tearful but not awful. I explained (not that he has a clue what I meant) that he woke up too early and it's time to get up now not earlier.
We normally get up as soon as we hear him so he will definitely wonder what's going on.
Is it a bit harsh to think I might let him cry for a while in the morning until it's a reasonable time to get up? He's not a tiny baby now, so he should possibly be learning to stay in bed for a while in the morning?
Am I being hard hearted?
If I do this I will set for alarm for 6.45 and then get up rather than make him wait so long as he did today.