I think YABU to air your friends story on a forum like this-adoption let alone disruption isn't common enough that those who know them will not recognize them from your post. And if they see this thread they will see judgments from people who see this one act but don't see the good things they have done in their lives- the amazing stuff that is in them. They see the wounded boy but not the wounded people
If you want to support them, then tell them you are sorry.
Tell them that actually they are brave, because whilst disruption is catastrophic to a child, I don't believe it is more damaging than them being raised in an environment where they are constantly reminded that they are a disappointment to the dream of adoption-where they are resented for their behaviours, where they are in a household of resentful and emotionally damaged people.
I don't think it is unreasonable for an adoptee to hold your friends accountable to the same standards as their own parents. That is what Furry is doing, for all we know she may have presented with a myriad of attachment problems that her parents coped with and helped her through. It's a sweeping judgement to assume she can't be resentful or judgemental because she must have been an easy child.
I also don't think that the sweeping statement should be made some children are too old to be adopted. Actually some children who are older at adoption can be less damaged, either their treatment wasn't as horrific so it took longer to see there was no hope for rehabilitating the family or because for their formative months/early years there was consistent nurturing care from either the birth mother or a relative who then becomes unable to provide that anymore. Both of these circumstances can offer an older child the chance to heal into a new family. On the flip side they can both be quite damaging to children if they aren't handled well. But earlier removal wont always give you a more successful outcome.
In our prep class there was a family who adopted a four year old, who had a consistent reliable attachment figure, it was only when that person was no longer around that the child's life was allowed to fall apart and intervention became necessary- that child actually is very grounded into their new family. A lot more so than another child whose infancy was horrific yet they were younger at removal.
I don't think it is BU to air the topic for discussion, there are so many things that cloud adoption. We have a child and time after time when we went for help with adoption support we were kept at arms length because most adopters with a child like ours disrupt and they didn't want to invest the financial and emotional resources into a sad ending- but actually our child is now doing really really well, ironically at great cost to ourselves but without those who were paid to provide support to us by the state.
BUT not everyone is cut out for the challenges that adoption can bring. Not everyone can or cares to make the sacrifices that it involves, they connect into adoption because they want their dream child, or they want to change a child's life and make it perfect.
Are they willing to give up their careers to do it- not always no. Are they willing to accept along the way their house may well be trashed and their walls dented, that they themselves will be lashed out at
People will feel entitled to judge and blame?
That accessing support will be like pulling hens teeth?
Are they willing to accept that 100 times they will be reminded they are not the parents, until the child has traveled through it all and is scaffolded enough to see what a parent actually is, and all the while knowing that when their child turns 18 the person who damaged them, and ruined their childhood can just write letters to them and slip straight back in there.
Adoption takes love and lots of other stuff. So does parenting a birth child I know that, but birth children generally aren't crippled by trauma abuse and disrupted attachments.
There is no consistency in the process- one agency might turn potential adopters down, they will go to another agency who take them to panel successfully in 12 weeks flat. One agency will send a child off into a new life with an amazing support package-another might send an identical child off with their fingers crossed that they wont have to fund anything at all.
There are some people out there who would be bloody good at adoption but their age or health habits or financial circumstances make it hard to even contemplate. Social workers checklists mean that they probably wouldn't get approved, we listened to a social worker in all seriousness explain that she didn't like middle class educated people adopting because it is social engineering, actually from the wreck of a life that our child came from and the birth parents came from a bit of social engineering from people willing to research and work at changing that child's life's outcomes isn't such a bad thing.
The biggest obstacle to adoption is voters- because actually not enough adopters vote to make support a priority for anyone other than some maligned Tory politicians and children can't vote. When David Milliband a popular politician was in charge of the department that oversaw adoption- he decided he didn't like the system so he went abroad to adopt. I am glad he is happy with his children adopted from birth- but for other families he still could have changed things, especially the things he didn't like, who knows he might even have made changes that could have improved your friend's son's life.