I didn't post on MN when asked to keep DS1 at home during an Ofsted inspection.
I sat a home, ashamed, relieved that I didn't have to battle to get him in for a couple of days. Relieved that I wouldn't receive a phone call asking me to collect him because he had run out of class and was refusing to communicate.
I am no longer ashamed. I am now angry that a state school thought they way they treated my DS was appropriate. I wish Ofsted had seen the way they handled him. It didn't matter, they didn't great a good Ofsted anyway, but my DS was part of that school community, and Ofsted should have seen what was going on.
Needless to say, I found another school for him. When that school was inspected, the staff sent DS to talk to the Ofsted inspectors about reading. DS had no diagnosis, and there was no SN card to play.
With hindsight I am not at all ashamed of DSs behaviour. I am in fact very proud. He was telling us the best he could that that school was not where he should be. I have appologised to DS for sending him there. It was a mistake.
OP, children who can be disruptive deserve a good education, as do their class mates. If this cannot be provided with a particular child in the class, Ofsted should know.