MiddletonPink Sun 16-Nov-14 13:50:03
Choose your battles OP.
This isn't one of them.
It's her and your sons baby and if they choose to hunt you can silently disagree with it but nothing can stop them.
I am bemused by the number of posters telling Salsmum she must keep silent about her views. Is this really the way your families work, not daring to offer even the slightest criticism to relatives doing controversial things?
I'm country through and through, come from a farming family blah blah, and spent my youth tip-toeing round grandparents who hunted and were extremely pro-bloodsports (not just doing it, the whole house was decorated with dead things, paintings of hunting, meet cards on the mantelpiece etc).
In my spare time I went on anti-hunting protests, wrote letters and joined the League Against Cruel Sports, but never talked about my feelings for fear of upsetting (more like 'getting into trouble with') gparents. On about three occasions I managed a mild comment like "I don't like the sound of that" when they talked about something particularly grisly. I always felt this was wrong, and that it should have been possible for me to express my disagreements with them.
OP, you hold a majority view on a controversial activity. It's not some niche weird opinion to hold. I am
that your DIL knows how you feel yet expects you to be excited that her nephew's gone hunting. You would be totally right to express your opinions if/when the time comes that your own grandchild gets taken out on a hunt. It's not some neutral, drama-free activity like surfing or tiddlywinks is it?!
Of course "nothing can stop them" if they insist on taking your gc out hunting, but you have the right to express (diplomatically) your moral disapproval of animal cruelty. I'm surprised to see so many people saying you shouldn't.