The point is that regardless of whether you like shopping at tesco and can feed ten million children, 6 cats, a horse and a swarm of locusts on half a chicken a week, I should have the CHOICE about where I shop. I shouldn't have that choice taken away from me just because I was unfortunate enough to have to flee my psychopath of an ex. It restrictive and feels like a punishment for daring to have fallen on harder times.
I receive lone parent benefits. I pay £120 top up on my rent over my HB. I have money guzzling pre payment meters, live in the middle of nowhere so pay a high amount in public transport costs each week and have an ex who frequently "forgets" to pay me maintenance. However I'm frugal and I make use of the money I get in clever ways. I keep chickens. The eggs from said chickens are used at the village produce swaps in return for meat and dairy which I'd struggle to afford very often otherwise. I have dug most of my pretty garden into an huge ugly veg plot and grow as much as I can. Unfortunately soil is rather poor and I mostly get potatoes, beans and salad leaves. I have an honesty box stall out front for windfall apples from my tree an use that money towards the heating fund.
IDS and his ilk don't even conceive of the idea that some of us "scroungers" live like that. They assume we are all lazy idiots who buy takeaways, ready meals and brighthouse tvs. My way of life existed before I claimed benefits and will continue when I stop claiming benefits, yet this scheme would see me forced to do away with all the above, (I certainly couldn't buy chicken feed with cash at the local livestock market anymore, I wouldn't be able to afford to keep them, which would be a loss of vital currency round here), and I would be constrained to big chain shopping. It's a safety net designed to support us when we need us, until we get back on our feet. I should have to change my whole way of life because for a few years I need to rely on some state help.