The 1.6 children in "severe poverty" is nothing like severe poverty in other contries. Its simply based on being under a certain percentage. Of course charities are going to quote it as they want public funds.
Theres little point throwing more money at the problem, those with children on benefits often have a higher household income than a lone worker in a standard job. If benefits truly provided the bare basics, then the thousands that choose to live on them wouldnt do so.
Schools already teach so much and not sure they could stretch to cover anything else but somebody needs to do it. Maybe the Home Ec GCSE should be compulsory and include managing a budget. Various scenarios inc saving for rainy days and cutting back if something changes. Showing salaries for jobs, the cost of having a child etc. Breaking the mindset and instilling a sound knowledge base and good work ethic would be a start.
There is no excuse to not eat decently in the UK. Food is cheap and supermarkets sell fresh fruit and veg very cheaply. Its down to how the adults spend their money. Some will spend on decent food whilst some prefer to buy rubbish so they can still have their wine, smoke or the latest gadget.
The poster who said grammar and cleanliness is ripped apart on MN whilst producing numerous children and not working to provide for them properly is defended to the hilt is spot on. Its a no no on MN to suggest people should wait to have children or not have them at all if they cant afford them. Then its the states fault for not throwing money at them when they do have them and realise they need feeding and clothing etc.