Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Workfare scheme for loan parents of children as young as 3, as of next month.

999 replies

WaterLoadaCack · 01/04/2014 21:54

kept that quiet didnt they

OP posts:
Darkesteyes · 02/04/2014 21:51

MisspixietrixWed 02-Apr-14 18:43:25

susyot I know plenty of Employers who haven't and won't entertain anyone with workfare references on a CV.

While on one of the similar "courses" back in the 90s i said this would happen and got laughed at.

EatShitDerek · 02/04/2014 21:56

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

DontCareAboutYourShoes · 02/04/2014 22:00

Plus if half of the employers are as judgemental as some of the posters on this thread, they will associate workfare on a reference with lazy benefit scum who had to be forced off their arses and dragged away from their jezza. So it's like screaming DONT EMPLOY ME.

stubbornstains · 02/04/2014 22:07

Good point shoes.

bochead · 02/04/2014 22:18

To be fair the lone parents advisors I've encountered at the job centre in two different parts of the country have been absolutely lovely, and very apologetic when telling me that scheme a, b, c, or x is going to screw me over rather than help me get off benefits in the sort term. (sadly zero hours contracts for experience, self-selected voluntary opportunities or mumpreneur schemes don't pay off in the immediate short term, even if often the 12 month picture is rosy).

In effect the government is saying to good women - yup you can have a 20 year 40% tax paying role, post grad quals etc, etc - but NONE of that matters if your man leaves you or dies on your arse, cos now your unwanted celibate sexual activity status means you are scum. Or maybe those women that have managed to hang onto their man against all the odds, really ARE better human beings than the rest of us? Even Dolly Parton regards her stage act as a caricature ffs.

Sadly I can see a sharp increase in prostitution, petty theft and drug dealing convictions looming on the horizon for ex-professional women who would never in a million years have seen themselves involved in criminal behavior but who succumb out of sheer desperation.

The Victorian work house was a grim place, and rates of child prostitution, and more petty crimes in those days was off the scale. Is this really what we want as a society? It's not the fairer society so many of our forebears fought so hard to achieve for us, nor is it the legacy I'm comfortable passing onto the next generation.

Fusedog · 02/04/2014 22:25

She give the people expect to earn there benfits the world smallest violin my oh has been up since 6am just got home

And we still have no money afte the govermnet takes out tax to pay for these poor people to sit at home

THATS what's not fair

Fusedog · 02/04/2014 22:27

No in effect the govermnt are saying that sitting at home on the tax payer is no longer a option the general pubic will not suffer It any longer and the days of the left effectively bribing the working class with welfare IS OVER

bochead · 02/04/2014 22:28

fusedog - I note you didn't say it was YOU that got up at 6am lol!

Fusedog · 02/04/2014 22:30

so I do not expect the tax payer to fund our choice as a family for me to stay at home and look after our children

And when I was a single parent before I was married I worked and put my child in childcare

MoominsYonisAreScary · 02/04/2014 22:33

No money? You must spend too much then. My oh earns a little too much for us to qualify for any benefits and we have plenty left after tax.

Fusedog · 02/04/2014 22:33

The op pretty much started a thread as if she can't believe the cheek of the government asking people do something for something rather then do nothing for something

Yeah what a cheek imagin that asking people to do something in exchange for the tax payer support you and your family Hmm

DontCareAboutYourShoes · 02/04/2014 22:35

fuse, is your "oh" on a massive wage? If he isn't, he doesn't contribute squat to these "poor people who sit at home". Probably doesn't even cover what your family use.

And read the thread to see why single parents can't all work and use childcare. Neither exists for a lot of people.

RandallFloyd · 02/04/2014 22:38

Rofl @ benefit badgers Grin
Bit more exciting than a scabby old goat though eh?

MoominsYonisAreScary · 02/04/2014 22:42

I want a badger, much better than a goat Grin

expatinscotland · 02/04/2014 22:43

'Yeah what a cheek imagin that asking people to do something in exchange for the tax payer support you and your family hmm'

What a cheek of this fucking government to expect us taxpayers to subsidise big business even more and the cost of driving down wages for all us and fewer jobs for every one of us.

Sick of paying out for them and their shareholder mates to get even richer and paying for them to get free labour and create even fewer real jobs, not this zero hours, self-employed sack of shit.

DontCareAboutYourShoes · 02/04/2014 22:43

I want both. That's the way us folk on benefits roll. Grabby grabby.

Darkesteyes · 02/04/2014 22:45

Fuse do try and close Closer magazine and see the bigger picture occasionally The Gov. just laugh at ppl that come out with the same things you do because it shows the divide and rule is working so well. 6am till 10.30 is a very long day for someone who isnt earning much. How would you cope if you found out he had been indulging in extra curricular activities and you split and you had to claim. Im guessing you would probably be asking for advice on here after a swift name change of course. Wouldnt be the first time ive seen that kind of hypocrisy on here.

stubbornstains · 02/04/2014 22:45

sitting at home on the taxpayer Grin

And where's my taxpayer to sit on? Am I entitled to one? I had no idea! If I could have a nice, soft, cushiony, sweet-smelling one that'd be great- I'm thinking someone like the late Clare Rayner?

...(at least there's one person on this thread that a Job Centre basic literacy course would benefit then Grin)

MoominsYonisAreScary · 02/04/2014 22:46

Grabby fucker shoes, and whos going to pay to walk the goat and badger while you do your workfare Grin

AmberLeaf · 02/04/2014 22:47

Are taxpayers for benefit claimants to sit on, the new goat?

DontCareAboutYourShoes · 02/04/2014 22:47

Fuck! Didn't think of that! Maybe lack of goat and badger care might be seen as a valid reason to miss it? Shock

DontCareAboutYourShoes · 02/04/2014 22:48

Oooh and I would also like a taxpayer to sit on. Give me it all! I'll have all your taxpayers too.

MoominsYonisAreScary · 02/04/2014 22:48

I want a tax payer that looks like Norman Reedus, id sit on him any day of the week

MoominsYonisAreScary · 02/04/2014 22:50

Maybe the tax payers can walk the goat and badger, if they are not too tired from all the working and being sat on

AmberLeaf · 02/04/2014 22:51

Can I specify where exactly on Norman Reedus i'd like to sit Wink