We all know that there are very few purely vegetarian restaurants.
However, there are plenty of restaurants which are not ALL about the meat, that surely it make a bit more sense to go to, if you're so hysterically vegetarian that you'd have this sort of reaction to eating meat.
Nandos is all about the chicken. Burger chains are all about the beef. Seafood restaurants are all about the fish. Etc.
But it is entirely possible to find a slew of restaurants that, yes, serve meat and fish, but that don't sell themselves as meat specialists. In fact, I'd say the vast bulk of restaurants fall into this category.
Nandos is a chicken restaurant. Flogging chicken is their main business.
If you're the sort of person who is so hysterically vegetarian that you have this sort of reaction to eating meat, then why oh why would you go into a chicken speciality restaurant in the first place?
I'm not saying that it's OK to inadvertently feed a vegetarian meat. It's patently not. But - once again - if you're so vehemently vegetarian that you go to the press about eating meat, then I cannot for the life of me understand why Nandos is somewhere you would ever even set foot.
As I say, there is no way that she has not eaten chicken by-products every other time she has been there. Clearly she is OK with that. Why is it now such a huge problem?