From my point of view.
It was/is the best local school imo, not in terms of ofsted and results. But the size of the school, the facilities, the staff.
The religious teachings aren't any different to that of when I was at a non faith school in the early 90s. We did hymns and morning prayer, nativity and visited church back then, school being completely impartial on religion is a fairly new thing.
The religious teachings aren't what I'd call very 'in your face', and most of it is simply teaching good values. They still learn about other religions and have little celebrations for other festivals but also focus a lot on the importance of the major important Christian festivals such as Easter and Christmas and the history behind these.
It's a lovely school and they although priority is given to children of that faith there were also places left for non faith, so why shouldn't I or anyone take that place if I think it's the best school for my child?
I understand people's annoyance that schools are partly subsidised by the church however why is that any more unfair than somebody paying for private school.
I really don't know why people get so up in arms over faith schools, use them, don't use them. It's up to you.
But most of you will be celebrating Christmas this year, why if you're an atheist? Because of course you will do what makes your family and children happy. Which is why I send my child to that school. He's happy and part of a happy caring school community and he's free to make his own mind up about religion as and when he chooses.