Why's it racist? People who aren't gypsys kidnap children so why would a certain group be excluded from suspicion if there is a reason
But that has not been said. It has all been about Gypsies / Roma. Tia Sharpe and the girls from Soham were abducted by white men, but no one is putting that forward as a link to a disappearance.
I'm not saying one group should be excluded, but this thread is all about one racial group being kidnappers.
Don't you dare call me racist
You might not be, but the thread, as I read it this morning was. All I had to go on was the thread because I could not follow your link. Thanks to others for posting.
Having now read the links, it seems the 'parents' have registered a large number of children, between 5 and 10 born in 10 months (different numbers for different reports) but there is nothing about them being DNA tested.
Especially as this little girl has been discovered in the exact same place as Ben was purpoted to have been.
Er............. no about 900Km from Kos, that's further than the distance from Glasgow to London.
So lets put this in perspective. If a small boy went missing on a Scottish Island and 20 years later a girl who doesn't look like a gypsy is found on a site in London all travelers /Roma /gypsies in London should be, in your words, 'investigated', to see if they are linked to the disappearance in Scotland?
Lets stop it being Gypsies, and blond haired blue eyed children are quite common in Scotland so lets make the children black as they are not as common.
A 2 year old black boy goes missing on a Scottish Island, 20 years later a 4 year old black girl is found living with white people in Cornwall (another place black people are still quite rare), the child is not genetically related to the 'parents'. Do we assume all white Cornish people are child abductors?
Does that sound at all reasonable?