zzzzz Thu 20-Jun-13 10:51:35
"I'm not sure what you mean by "actual language delay"? Do you mean speech and language deficits that are not caused by neglect?"
I meant: I am not sure the government are talking about clinical speech delay in small children, the kind of thing that might need a speech therapist. For that kind of delay to be caused by neglect, you would indeed need a serious level of neglect and very few parents are that neglectful (and if they are, a leaflet isn't going to do much good).
And conversely, if your child has SN, then a communicative parent won't take the SN away, though s/he may still make a massive difference to his chances of doing as well as possible. But this is not what the discussion is about imo.
I think they are talking about social disadvantage in older children: what Biscuitsareme mentioned, missing out on the good communicator skills that are essential for higher education and well paid jobs.
In other words, we are talking about children who can speak perfectly well for their ordinary everyday needs, but who haven't got used to the kind of reasoning and thinking out an argument that you need to do well even at A-level.
When you do your university interview, a heavy working class accent isn't going to do you any harm, nor is the occasional swearword (unless you swear aggressively at the admissions officer). But the inability to develop an argument, the lack of habit of reasoning your way through a problem will tell against you.
Nobody thinks this is a new problem, only that our modern society places far higher demands on communications skills - and that we are no longer happy with the concept of the rich man in his castle, the poor man at the gate, which seemed a perfectly satisfactory arrangement to the Victorians.