Pro-abortion is simply a very immature term to suggest. No pro-choicer is going around rubbing their hands in glee, thinking "Oooh, lovely, fun abortions, yippee!". No-one's thinking "Yay! Lots of women will be having abortions today, get in!". Abortions are necessary because they re necessary and women have the right to choice one - hence the term pro-choice.
A 5 week old foetus is simply not the same as an actual, living baby. Not in any real, practical sense at all. The similarity exists purely in the minds of anti-abortionists, for whatever reasons, be it that they are too intellectually or emotionally unstable or immature to understand how incredibly different in all ways an embryo and living child are, or that there minds are clouded with irrelevant religious clap trap, or that they are simply incredibly judgemental and wrongly presume that they should have a say in the lives of other and need to get a life, or maybe they are just plain old misogynists or female self-identifying misogynists. I don't really care what the reason is, really, because there an be no true dialogue with someone who cannot and will not see the massive difference, because they are not capable of rational and structured thought on the matter.
Anyone who thinks that abortions are easy things that women just do on a whim to escape from responsibilities disgusts me. They clearly do not live in the real world, they make it obvious they struggle with even the most basic skills of perception and empathy, and yet they wade in with their illogical, judgemental, hateful, scientifically-dodgy crap, trying to present themselves as the ones who care about people.
Well, what about the actual LIVING BEINGS? The women who have to carry the pregnancy are reall living people, with needs and lives and feelings and problems and people depending on them. They matter more than something growing inside them. They have more rights. They take priority. To say differently is to actually be anti-life, not pro-life. Placing your priorities on something not het fully real over a real person indicates psychological disturbance and a lack of true morality that is then covered up with emotive outpourings and proclamations of 'caring', etc. I personally think many pro-lifers are using the issue as a crutch to not look at real problems in their own life, or the world around them, and also lack true empathy and caring and use it as a method to cover this up and deny it to themselves. Otherwise, what it the reason for wanting to deny someone real rights over something that is not yet real?!