AIBU?
16 children not going on year 6 residential
Restorer · 04/05/2013 11:12
Out of a year group of 40ish.
School doesn't know "reasons" for them not going, but it's likely IMO that most is down to cost. Some will be because they/their parents didn't want to be away from home.
The yr6 teacher, who will be at school with the 16, is planning activities for the week. She feels sad that these children are missing out on "experiences" and wants to do something everyday for the week. So far has arranged for them to go swimming at the local comp (free) a day at an outdoor activity centre (£32 each, plus transport) bowling (£5?)and a session at the local Wildlife Trust reserve (£4.50 plus transport)
The parents haven't been told anything about this yet, but AIBU to think that if you'd had to say no to residential because of the (£230) cost, you'd be annoyed/upset at the request for money for all these activities while the others were away?
The teacher means well and I support entirely the desire to provide experiences and fun for these children who are missing out, but I don't think she has any idea just how much £50 is to some families.
If you agree, do you have any ideas for ways to provide fun and experiences more cheaply?
FadedSapphire · 04/05/2013 11:16
I think it is very sad that some children can't get away because of 'cost'.
Our primary discreetly helps out financially in cases where children will miss out because of cost alone.
I think you are right re cost of events for those left behind and again maybe school should help out here with families who need help. Has to be done sensitively though.
SuffolkNWhat · 04/05/2013 11:25
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Pancakeflipper · 04/05/2013 11:25
Our school plan things that are far cheaper.
They have done woodland walks.
Gone on the bus to the museum and art galleries (free entry).
The other year the ones remaining planned an afternoon of sports for one of the other year groups and it was amazingly cute to see the reception children running holding hands with a Y6.
One year the group did a gardening task -planning, clearing, creating. And they had fish'n'chips as a treat. Again cost effective.
piratecat · 04/05/2013 11:25
blimey, that one day of £32 is crackers.
The activities might be ones the kids don't wont to do, so what a waste.
Was there any provision for those children on school meals to have the residential at a lower price, this is, luckily (for us)what they do at dd's primary.
SuffolkNWhat · 04/05/2013 11:27
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
insancerre · 04/05/2013 11:34
If my child was not going because of cost ten I would not be able to pay for these other trips either.
Surely it's a no-brainer?
I would struggle paying for all those trips myself now tbh.
Did the parents not get the option to pay for the residential trip weekly?
Restorer · 04/05/2013 11:35
The interesting thing (I find) is that the FSM families often find the money. This year particularly, the working poor have become a really big group. Many families with one or both parents working are finding life really tough, with rising costs and changes to tax credits. Maybe it's because they have lifestyles (mortgages/cars) that the FSM families can only dream of, but for whatever reason, it seems to be this group that have really struggled this year. I know this because I'm the bursar and deal with the dinner money and children's club arrears etc.
As the bursar, I know we might be able to help FSM children, but we really don't have the money to fund 16 residential places for working families.
Those that are going on the residential have been paying monthly since September, so not really that big a monthly commitment. Still it has been a real struggle getting the money paid.
letseatgrandma · 04/05/2013 11:40
Cancel the expensive residential. Let all the children stay behind and join in the cheaper activities as a year group. Bloody disgraceful that some get the chance to go away whilst others don't. And don't tell me "life's unfair" - they're 10/11 years old!
So what about in 6 month's time when they're at secondary school and skiing trips etc are arranged? Should these not be organised because it might upset some children who can't afford it?
Restorer · 04/05/2013 11:41
They could have paid weekly if they wanted insancerre. they were told £x by the end of each month, but we took the money, in whatever amounts and whenever they wanted to pay it.
Orange - you wouldn't believe the outrage there'd be if we didn't offer the majority the opportunity for a yr6 residential.
insancerre · 04/05/2013 11:45
oh good
daft idea to cancel the trip
DD had a fantastic time on hers and it really was a milestone for her- the first time away on her own
any chance of getting in a theatre group or clown school or something similiar and the school paying?
do you have any drama colleges nearby that would do a free show?
LydiasLunch · 04/05/2013 11:46
My daughter refused to go on the residential in year 6 after watching the film that informed them there'd be no time for reading books, just non stop outdoor adventures and fun. She's like Wednesday Addams. Not every kid wants to go on these trips. I took her out for a couple of days.
NatashaBee · 04/05/2013 12:09
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Fairyliz · 04/05/2013 12:09
Restorer I do the same job as you and yes I agree its the working poor who are struggling more than those on FSM. I don't think that relatively well paid teachers who often have professional partners understand how difficult it is for some people.
I gave my teachers a good talking to about trips, but then I am old and miserable so they are all afraid of me!
NatashaBee · 04/05/2013 12:12
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
superbagpuss · 04/05/2013 12:13
my sister and I are the same age - not twins, long story, - so couldn't go on the trip in year six as two expensive for both of us. spent the week either in our classroom on our own on the computer or in the class below.
life's not fair
I now have a great job and work hard so my children can do what they want
exoticfruits · 04/05/2013 12:16
I don't think that you should stop trips because some can't afford them but at the same time I think it is cost rather than overprotective parents and therefore they need a fun week at school with no costs. It is embarrassing, parents do not want to say they can't afford it.
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.