Completely with Mavis I do the same as much as I can.
And tbh *because of dc2 SN, it had to be like this as neither rewards nor punishments worked with him.
Explaining, demonstrating (ie do as I do) worked very well.
I think we all have some 'trigger points' things that we see as non negotiable. Teeth brushing was negociable in my house. I have never brushed my dcs teeth (Try to have your DH do that to you and you will see how uncomfortable it is), gave them a toothbrush and hope some bits of teeth would be cleaned a bit.
With the idea that children will not be able to brush their teeth properly on their won until they are 7yo, I decided not to put any pressure on the dcs until that age. As it turns out,they both had been brushing their teeth wo a complain much before that (and the help of an electric toothbrush has made brushing more efficient too).
The 'not hitting problem' has been much more of a trigger point for us because dc2 (HFA) is lashing out a lot. But thanks to UP, it means that when he lashes out, I can see the anger and the fear/anxiety rather than a child who is misbehaving. So that's what I concentrate on. His real needs for support at that time and then we cam talk about not hurting and what else we can do. And it is slowly working but I have felt more than once the need to be 'stronger' in my approach because well... I have dc1 that I need to protect too.
In reality though, if you were seen me in the street after such an incident, you would probably tut a lot.... I usually end up comforting dc2 a lot and intervening before dc2 uses hands to teach them how to find a compromise. Lots of talking, turn taking, expressing what you want/need and then trying to find solutions together. That IS time consuming but both dcs are learning skills that few of their mates have.
But surely with the cold and the coat situation, the child would only experience consequences and learn if no coat was brought along so they have to deal with the cold?
But isn't it cruel to leave a child getting so cold that their lips get blue just for you to prove a point? The child will already have learnt that no coat = getting cold at the time you have handed the coat over to them. But for the parent not to take the coat on purpose 'to teach them a lesson' is something different when the same parent would actually take a book for the child if there is a long wait, a snack for an afternoon outing etc...
if your child was blue lipped with cold, and was visibly shivering, but still denying they were cold (as children do).
Mines have never felt the need to express their need of independence/being a person in their own right in that way.