Well to be honest. I have considered this.
But I think there is a massive difference between having it done for the reasons why it was invented, (discomfort, damage due to accident or childbirth) and "asthetics conformation" for your average woman.
The same way that breast reduction/enlargement has it's place where pain, discomfort, breast loss, extreme lack asymetrical size, notable sagging at a young age are issues.
But the idea that we need boobies blown up to a certain cup size and required "bounceyness" or vulvas conforming to a certain degree of "tidyness"...that is an issue.
The docs I think are promoting the idea with an eye on improving their income stream. Some, probably in America will go all "ahead of a trend" on it, and then it will seep into the general idea of normal and then spread to europe etc.
Just like the vajazzle and "attack of the weed whacker" on pubes did.
Sticking glitter and sequins on your baldy muff isn't a big deal in the bog scheme ofmthings I guess. But if it is part of a bigger picture that demands conformity and "prettying up" of women's genitals, then it is a bit more worrying.
I'm going to dig out a link to that "art" plastercast display of lots of vaginas and save it somehwere safe to have it at the ready for when boyo is a big boy, just so he has something normal to compare to the messages he is possibly going to be hearing. I don't want him inadvertantly becoming part of a new wave of squashing women via thier knicker and bra contents.
Damn it. This should not be part of my job as a mother of a boy.
Fucking "elective and unnessary focused" plastic surgoens and their insatiable greed for Gucci.