Thanks to another thread, I've just been over to the HousePriceCrash forum, and there was a rather interesting item I thought I;d ask about:
www.housepricecrash.co.uk/forum/index.php?showtopic=50262
... *nytime negotiations are entered into regarding extending the lease, the s21 is invalidated and the LL must issue a new s21 notice giving you a further 2 months notice to evict you. (But in court, the onus of proof is on the tenant so get any negotiations in writing)
It looks something like this: www.letlink.co.uk/GeneralInfo/Gener...ion/S21_1_B.pdf
This is all above board when used within the spirit of the law and gives the tenant at least two months to find alternative accommodation.
Where the s21 becomes the Sword of Damocles is when the LL issues you with an s21 notice RIGHT AT THE BEGINNING OF THE TENANCY, to expire at the end of your fixed term. This is even when you have taken the tenancy under the understanding that it is a long term arrangement.
If you question the notice, the LL will say something like "it's just for insurance purposes" or "its just paperwork don't worry about it" or "if we get on well together we'll just ignore it" or some soothing fob off like that.
But in reality, once the fixed term expires, you have no right to notice as YOU HAVE ALREADY RECEIVED IT. The landlord can go to court at anytime for an immediate eviction order. They rely on the tenant being either not aware of its implications or unaware they have even been served a possession notice.
There are two instance where this is invalidated
1/ when you sign another fixed term lease
2/ when you negotiate to extend the lease, even if it is to say the lease will lapse into a periodic tenancy.*
Can any housing gurus on this thread confirm that this is so?
There was also a link to Lardlord Zone about it: www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?6803-New-landlord-seeks-advice-does-this-scheme-sound-safe