Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think horses do not belong in the Olympics

759 replies

StunningCunt · 07/08/2012 15:31

They've got this horse prancing sideways with a toff in a top hat on the top, and they are devoting hours of TV coverage because we might get a gold medal in this nonsense?

Why don't they just have a dog show there and be done with it?

Competitive sheep herding?

Motor racing?

OP posts:
yellowraincoat · 07/08/2012 15:31

Yes, I agree. I'm sure it requires a great deal of skill or whatever, but I have a long list of sports that should not be in the Olympics and this is one of them.

Sirzy · 07/08/2012 15:32

But show jumping/dressage etc are sports so why shouldn't they be there?

I would much rather watch this than the boxing

zeeboo · 07/08/2012 15:33

Awww more inverted snobbery on Mumsnet. Bless!

peeriebear · 07/08/2012 15:33

I like the showjumping etc but dressage leaves me cold. I just don't get it.

blueemerald · 07/08/2012 15:34

I agreed with you until I found out that the horses have to come from the same country as the competitor so it truly is a comparison of riders and horses from around the world.

Petsinmyolympicpudenda · 07/08/2012 15:35

I would love Olympic sheep herding.

The herder would have to be dressed in the skimpy diving pants, while yelling 'come by, come by' down the field

I would expect the dogs to be dressed up to

OatyBeatie · 07/08/2012 15:35

Why is a sport more nonsensical because it has a horse in it? Do sports become nonsensical when they involve bicycles, or boats? Or balls or boots?

sugarice · 07/08/2012 15:36

I love seeing the horses! Surely the skill of rider and horse working together should be celebrated, more so than football and tennis.

Salmotrutta · 07/08/2012 15:36

I'd rather watch equestrian events than synchronised swimming. Grin

... and they are definitely not all toffs. Did you not hear the show-jumpers being interviewed last night?
And people like Harvey Smith would never ever have been described as a toff. I miss his two-fingered salute Grin

yellowraincoat · 07/08/2012 15:36

No, OatyBeatie, because, if you hadn't noticed, a horse is a living, breathing creature.

SarahStratton · 07/08/2012 15:37

Dressage is beautiful, and incredibly skilled and difficult. Angry

toboldlygo · 07/08/2012 15:37

It's a more valid sport than bloody rhythmic gymnastics.

Again with the inverted snobbery, too.

OatyBeatie · 07/08/2012 15:37

Why does that make a difference?

chipsandmushypeas · 07/08/2012 15:37

I agree, poor horsies

BarredfromhavingStella · 07/08/2012 15:38

YABU, dressage requires an astonishing amount of skill-I also think it's quite lovely to watch.

yellowraincoat · 07/08/2012 15:38

Because you are relying on the horse's mood and temper and fitness as much as you are relying on your own.

A bicycle, beautiful as it is, does not have a temper.

Pickles77 · 07/08/2012 15:39

Poor horses? Are you being serious??

NiniLegsInTheAir · 07/08/2012 15:39

blueemerald - No they don't. The horses have to BELONG to a citizen of that country. Most of the horses in the olympics were bred/brought up in countries different to the one they're representing.

I love the equestrian events but find the dressage boring. I'm not enough of an expert to know what a good round looks like compared to a bad one.

rogersmellyonthetelly · 07/08/2012 15:39

Ok, you lot are philistines I tell you! The person wearing the top hat isn't a toff, they are just wearing traditional dress for dressage. The poncing about takes years and years of training and building of muscle, obedience, relaxation, not to mention the right mental state to accept the rider and move like that without being disturbed by the atmosphere. Show jumping is more exciting to someone not really into horses, but trust me when I tell you, show jumping is a walk in the park compared to the skill and obedience of dressage.

Birdsgottafly · 07/08/2012 15:39

I don't agree, this needs skills, as well as ability and training.

The olympics were sports that showed and tested/developed talents that would cross over into life/war, managing horses is one of those, as relevent today as ever.

One of the exhibitions in London is how horses have helped to shape human life and how we wouldn't have developed as we have without them, so Equestrian events should be in the olympics.

Dogs have their seperate events in other shows and competitions.

We still need working dogs and horses, even in the developed western world.

Treblesallround · 07/08/2012 15:39

I assume you're not a rider? perhaps if you had a try you'd understand the demands? Or is it the toff bit that gets you? Do you know for a fact it's a toff on top? If so, why is that a problem?

GetOrfMoiRing · 07/08/2012 15:39

I think competitive sheep herding would be a marvellous idea.

I think there should also be a sport involving alpacas, just because they look funny.

TheDreadedFoosa · 07/08/2012 15:39

I would have an opinion on this but have banned myself from talking about anything horseysporty related since the recent conversation about water polo where i wondered how the horses got in and out of the pool.

Salmotrutta · 07/08/2012 15:40

"Poor horsies" - ? They are probably quite well treated you know Hmm

GrimmaTheNome · 07/08/2012 15:40

There's all sorts of variables in lots of sports. Presumably part of the skill of the rider is to deal with the temperament of the mount, in a similar way that a sailor has to deal with the variability of the wind.