Threads

Topics

Usernames

Mumsnet Logo
Please
or
to access all these features

To approve of a German courts decision re circumcision
618

SlipperyNipple · 29/06/2012 10:33

Apologies if this has already been covered.

I am Jewish by descent but an an agnostic. I think the time has come to say that being religious is not an excuse to carry out mutilation of small boys.

www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/27/circumcision-ruling-germany-muslim-jewish?newsfeed=true

Obviously Female circumcision is already illegal but the same protection should be given to boys.

OP's posts:
Please
or
to access all these features

CheyenneStark · 29/06/2012 10:35

YANBU!!! It's barbaic! People get away with too much in the name of faith and we're all supposed to be respectful. Well some lines you just don't cross and lobbing off body parts would be one of them.

Please
or
to access all these features

tulipsaremyfavourite · 29/06/2012 10:36

Totally agree. It's assault or even GBH on a baby.

Please
or
to access all these features

CruCru · 29/06/2012 10:37

I do find it surprising that circumcision is not more controversial in the UK. I also approve of the decision.

Please
or
to access all these features

hackmum · 29/06/2012 10:38

I'm not going to defend male circumcision, but it is really not appropriate to compare it to female genital mutilation, which involves cutting off the clitoris, cutting off the labia and in extreme cases sewing up the vagina.

Please
or
to access all these features

starpine · 29/06/2012 10:40

yanbu it is barbaric and outdated how can anyone argue in its defence, it is forced mutilation. cant believe it is still legal.

Please
or
to access all these features

gymmummy64 · 29/06/2012 10:40

Agree entirely, I have never understood why it is so acceptable

Please
or
to access all these features

ChickensHaveNoLips · 29/06/2012 10:41

YANBU. No one should be cutiing bits off of anyone else without their expressed permission.

Please
or
to access all these features

nightowlmostly · 29/06/2012 10:41

Yanbu, I've always wondered how this is still allowed in our so-called civilised society. Chopping off body parts of children in the name of religion should be banned here as well, let's hope we follow suit.

Please
or
to access all these features

bunnywhack · 29/06/2012 10:42

I think you can compare you are still mutilating the genitals regardless of how much gets cut off without that persons consent

Please
or
to access all these features

nightowlmostly · 29/06/2012 10:43

It shouldn't be compared to FGM, but the idea that it should be allowed because it's not as barbaric as that is just daft.

Please
or
to access all these features

GrahamTribe · 29/06/2012 10:43

"A judge at a Cologne court said that the circumcision of minors went against a child's interests because it led to a physical alteration of the body, and because people other than the child were determining its religious affiliation."

The second argument is surely a moot point. YANBU, however.

Please
or
to access all these features

SlipperyNipple · 29/06/2012 10:45

I know female circumcision is much worse mutilation but NO mutilation should be acceptable.

I think this sums it up the best from the Guardian article:

Putzke, who is a leading voice in the discussion about circumcision and the law, welcomed the decision: "After the knee-jerk indignation has subsided, hopefully a discussion will kick off about how much religiously motivated violence against children a society is ready to tolerate."

OP's posts:
Please
or
to access all these features

nightowlmostly · 29/06/2012 10:50

A quote from the article:

Women's rights groups and social policy makers also condemned the decision, but for the reason that it would have the effect of putting male and female circumcision on the same footing

This is quite shocking to me. So society shouldn't protect men because women get mistreated as well? It's this sort of thing that gets feminism a bad name, and I say that as a feminist! The idea that boys shouldn't be afforded the basic right to not have pieces of their genitalia chopped off because worse things are done to women is quite offensive actually.

Please
or
to access all these features

Theas18 · 29/06/2012 10:55

Completely agree. THat photoas is heartbreaking

Please
or
to access all these features

hipposaurus · 29/06/2012 10:55

Yanbu. Circumcision is barbaric, good for the court.

Please
or
to access all these features

takingiteasy · 29/06/2012 10:56

But its not just done for religious reasons is it? in the USA it's common for hygiene and vanity reasons is it not?

Please
or
to access all these features

fluffyanimal · 29/06/2012 10:59

One should say "perceived hygiene" reasons. There is no hygenic benefit from circumcision.

Please
or
to access all these features

SlipperyNipple · 29/06/2012 11:00

I was thinking about Europe in my original post but I think the hygiene reasons are pretty dubious. Also nobody is saying that boys can't choose this for themselves when they are older.

OP's posts:
Please
or
to access all these features

AThingInYourLife · 29/06/2012 11:00

Why anybody would do it for vanity reasons is a mystery to me.

It's also not more hygienic.

Please
or
to access all these features

RichManPoorManBeggarmanThief · 29/06/2012 11:01

Yes- it's very popular in the USA, mainly for non-religious reasons. I have American friends of no religion who have had their sons done at birth

Please
or
to access all these features

GrahamTribe · 29/06/2012 11:02

Re hygiene - the risk of cervical cancer in the partners of circumcised men is reduced although imho it's not the duty of one person to be mutilated for the benefit of another.

Please
or
to access all these features

SlipperyNipple · 29/06/2012 11:04

Because Americans do it is no justification for European countries to allow it. I don't want capital punishment either. Lets lead the way here.

OP's posts:
Please
or
to access all these features

lisaro · 29/06/2012 11:06

Totally agree that it's a barbaric practice and should be stopped.

Please
or
to access all these features

SlipperyNipple · 29/06/2012 11:09

nightowlmostly I totally agree with you. I was utterly shocked and disgusted by that response from so called feminists. Totally repulsive.

OP's posts:
Please
or
to access all these features

nickelbarapasaurus · 29/06/2012 11:10

YANBU

I always wonder why it's the circumcised men that defend the "law" - is it because they don't want to admit that they've been mutilated against their will?

Please
or
to access all these features
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.