We're in the very enviable position of not having a mortgage on our property BUT we do have substantial credit card, loans etc. We have also got plans to significantly improve the house we've just moved into, such as loft conversion, converting the front garden into parking as our road is a nightmare. Husband talks about doing all this in the near future.
We don't have any savings so the only way we can afford to do this is if we consolidate our debt & borrow more against our house. Overall we'd be borrowing a very small percentage of the equity.
Anyway, my husband feels that mortgages are the work of the devil & that the minute you miss a payment your house will be repossessed. I think this stems from his parents not having a mortgage & his father is very anti-mortgage. The house isn't 100% in our names & I wonder if his father's reluctance to let us have the house in our names is a way to prevent us borrowing against the house.
I, on the other hand, have had mortgages & don't see a problem with them.
The only way we can afford the refurbishments is to hope for an inheritance from our parents & frankly that seems a little ghoulish...I don't want any of them to die in the near future.
So, apologies for the length, but who is BU or is it both of us?