Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the govt are purposefully trying to keep the poor down?

278 replies

Alltheseboys · 17/03/2012 20:00

Seems like with all these cuts the govt are deliberately trying to keep the working class down?

OP posts:
dreamingofsun · 18/03/2012 18:09

chicken - i thought that the recent job seekers allowance went up more than the current inflation figs due to the inflation figs last autumn. are you saying that the BBC are telling us figs and are biased towards the convercatives (this wpi;d be a first!)

dreamingofsun · 18/03/2012 18:10

i agree that house prices/rent are causing problems. And which gov allowed loads of immigration and therefore caused the demand on housing to become worse?

JuliaScurr · 18/03/2012 18:14

The touching faith that 'the market will provide'
This enthusiasm some have for getting off benefits and into work- as already pointed out, most claimants are working. Don't see much enthusiasm from Osborne to raise minimum wage, control rent etc. Wenow have mass youth unemploymen, highest women's unemployment for 23 years, etc. Growth in job creation is mainly part time. Kill 2 birds with one stone by building council houses - the great satan of public spending. So that won't happen.
And no, I don't think PCS is any more biased than this govt and I don't see why childrearing is a 'luxury' allowed only if related/married to high earner. Parents/carers should be economically supported.

Heswall · 18/03/2012 18:14

And housing benefit drives up rent prices just as tax credits have driven up house prices.

ShellyBoobs · 18/03/2012 18:15

...the government can ease companies off benefits by increasing the minimum wage to a wage people can afford to live on.

It's that simple is it?

The minimum wage could go up by £1/hr to £7.08/hr but then what happens to those who are already in a position that pays £7.08 per hour?

Hecubasdaughter · 18/03/2012 18:16

Of course I'm not prepared to commit fraud. I don't care what anyone says. DH was initially told he wasn't even entitled to CBJSA we had to appeal it and it took weeks to sort out.. The entitled to website is the only place that agrees we are entitled to more. We now have 3 letters rejecting our CTC claim and a few phone calls.

Heswall · 18/03/2012 18:19

I'd rob a bank before my kids would go into care and that was the situation you claimed you faced when I suggested fraud, just to give the full story.
I doubt it's anybody's first course of action.

ShellyBoobs · 18/03/2012 18:20

And housing benefit drives up rent prices...

Totally agree. The ridiculous and huge increase in HB under Labour is what screwed things up so comprehensively.

It gave landlords the opportunity to ramp up rents in the private rental market, as well as making property more valuable (due to the demand for buy-to-let properties) and so crippling those who want to buy.

Hecubasdaughter · 18/03/2012 18:22

I won't break the law under any circumstances if that makes me a bad mum then so be it.

Heswall · 18/03/2012 18:23

Gosh.

MistyMountainHop · 18/03/2012 18:36

yanbu

ChickenLickn · 18/03/2012 18:46

Food prices increased by 30% in the last 4 years.

ChickenLickn · 18/03/2012 18:48

Electricity and Gas increased by 15-18% just last year.

dreamingofsun · 18/03/2012 18:50

so what do you expect to happen? the middle earners pay even more tax? despite the fact that their food and electric prices have increased too? you can only expect middle earners to subsidise the lower earners to a certain extent and labour pushed that as far as could reasonably be expected.

ChickenLickn · 18/03/2012 18:58

Well dreamingofsun, I would compare that to the huge, unimaginable pay and profits of those at the top. CEOs earning MILLIONS while not paying their staff, in light of workfare.

I would keep in mind that those on low incomes such as jobseekers, can now not afford basic food and bills.

Therefore I would not support the government's proposal of tax giveaways for the richest, while pushing the poorest into further hardship.

WasabiTillyMinto · 18/03/2012 18:59

The pressure on housing, food and energy is due to National an d global population growth. Of course noone wants to address that. Even if we stoppedall immigration we would still have 10%growth by 2030.... You think prices are high now.....

slatternlymother · 18/03/2012 19:04

Surely though, there has to be an end point to all this; people no longer being able to pay their mortgages/bills etc; tens of thousands of people can't just be displaced. On a practical level, it's just not going to work!

Hecubasdaughter · 18/03/2012 19:06

So that's it! Ease the population pressure, kill off the poor by default and slow the population increase. Genius Grin.

ChickenLickn · 18/03/2012 19:09

Its not due to population growth, its due to rising inequality.

Those at the top, for example the FTSE 100 CEOs, awarding themselves 49% pay rises last year. In ONE year!

pinktrees · 18/03/2012 19:12

The opening post is idiotic. The government is trying to keep the country going as best it can in very difficult circumstances.

People seem to try and twist things any way it suits them. The government aren't trying to keep anyone down or persecute anyone, yet many people think the govt. is trying to:

  1. Penalise the poor
  2. Penalise the rich
  3. Penalise families
  4. Penalise single people
  5. Penalise women

..........the list of shite goes on and on. The govt. is simply trying to keep us afloat.

thefresheggnoodlePan · 18/03/2012 19:14

yes, global problems, or national problems, are not about resources available. They are about greed, which is the essence of capitalism. We are one of the very richest nations on the planet (6th iirc correctly) and we still wish to penalise our poor and vulnerable.
But we know this. And so does Cameron and Osbourne. The are just not bred to be interested.

MyNameIsntFUCKINGWarren · 18/03/2012 19:14

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

thefresheggnoodlePan · 18/03/2012 19:15

oh pink trees you know nothing and obv think less.

prawncrackered · 18/03/2012 19:21

Hecubas, have you tried the CAB? Because I strongly suggest you do.

I had a ridiculous situation with hmrc when I tried to claim wtc's last year and they too told me I wasn't entitled, even though all the benefit calculators clearly stated I was. I went down the CAB and problem was soon sorted.

ShellyBoobs · 18/03/2012 19:22

CEOs earning MILLIONS while not paying their staff, in light of workfare.

But what do you suggest?

If the big companies suddenly start paying their NMW workers £10/hr+ and their other staff proportionally more (in order to maintain some order they would have to increase all wages, otherwise no one would be a supervisor/manager) it would simply put many of the currently low paid workers on the dole.

Once the lowest paid jobs become financially attractive to better qualified, more experienced workers, those currently in them will find their days numbered.

That's not to mention the effect on inflation and the resulting impact on the economy.