MIL has had life long problems with anxiety - never sought professional help - but managed ok with everything while she had support from FIL. Very sadly FIL passed away a few years ago, of a horrible illness which obviously didn't help with her mental health at all. Now he has gone she has more or less retreated from the world outside her home (she doesn't drive, doesn't have social life, doesn't have internet, no longer had TV as couldn't cope with change to digital etc).
The year FIL died, we had DD - her first grandchild. We continued to drive the 2 - 3 hours to visit her but this started to become more of a chore for us (i.e travelling with screaming baby in car!). I've never had a problem with this, as I understood she was/is grieving and the idea of travelling to see us on the train was too much for her.
DH, however, feels increasingly let down by her refusal to travel to see us. His attitude is that it is easier for her to get trains and taxis than for us to drive with DD (she really objects to long car journeys!).
She has been to see us on the train twice since DD was born two years ago - both times she has worked herself up into a complete state about it.
We have driven down as much as we can but it is a pain because of DD crying all the way and also it is a four hour plus round trip - we can't stay over easily because there is no double bed and DD co-sleeps with us.
Anyway, DH has told her that it is her "turn" to come and see us on the train.
Today I got a letter from her (unusual in itself) and she has put that in it that DH had told her that she has to come up, and that she has had "three sleepless nights already at the thought of it" . . . God, I feel really guilty now. I am going to say to DH that I think we should drive down again - but I know he will say no, she has to come to us.
Should we force her to face her fears and come on the train, not pander to the anxiety problems? Or for the sake of DD seeing her grandma should we just keep driving down??