To return to the self satisfied parent who taught their children to read and write before school.
I was taught to read and write at age 3. Now dont get me wrong, I have always had high literacy standards as a result, and been able to enter wonderful worlds of books from a really young age.
But when I started school, I missed out on the shared learning experience that my classmates went through. I am not suggesting for a minute we should hold our children back in order to fit in with the majority. But for me, it was an isolating experience. I also had a lot of resentment coming my way from the other children.
I made a concious decision that the right thing to do was not to hothouse my own children and push them ahead. I read to them lots, they had books from when they were old enough to hold them, showed them some words etc. But they learned to read along with the rest of their cohort. They are both now, at 11 and 7, very fluent and advanced readers for their age. DD1 is reading adult books (no not those ffs!) and DD2 can read her way through a short novel in an hour. Their literacy is no worse than mines at that age; but their socialistion is far better.
The Scandanavian schooling system also shows that children in fact respond better as whole individuals to starting formal learning such as reading at a later age than we even do here.
Sorry, I realise this a complete hijack, but I do feel quite strongly that we should not be pushing our children ahead just so we feel better about their behaviour and accomplishment.