What rot, Pendeen. If someone is attractive to others there's no reason why they should deny it and if they are intelligent, there's no reason why they should play dumb.
I'm only attracted to intelligent confident males who are happy in their own skin as, IME, they tend not to feel threatened by their female counterparts.
I literally don't have time for the distractions of being 'in lurve' - the palpitating heart, waiting for the phone to ring, does he/doesn't stuff of teenage romance - and I find it expedient to conduct my affaires d'amour in a more detached manner.
I prefer to have liaisons with a select number of paramours who are as equally career oriented as myself, and who I see when I/they can find time to indulge our mutual interests and passions together.
Love has many forms, OP, and is it possible to have a satisfying relationship with, and become deeply fond of, another - or multiple others - without experiencing the heady flushes of 'lurve' or a desire for 'ownership'.
What I have going with my current paramours, and what they have going with me, is a tad more than a fuckbuddy arrangement in that we are bound by ties of mutual respect, consideration, and deep affection.
We fill the gaps, as it were, in each others' lives - we're never short of filling the 'spare' guest place at an exclusively couples function or having a companion for assorted events, days/evenings in and out, weekends and holidays away, and we're not afraid to say the words 'I love you' knowing that there is no possessiveness or ownership/exclusivity implied in such a declaration.
It's taken me a considerable period of time to get it right for me, but the rewards have been worth waiting for.
FTR, yes, of course, they have other paramours too; the net gain is that I have a man for all seasons and they have a woman for all occasions, and vice versa.