Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think I should not be threatened with a ban for questioning the use of offensive language?

1000 replies

thefirstMrsDeVere · 16/08/2011 15:35

I am a member of a very heavily moderated website. Swearing is not allowed at all, threads are pulled regularly if people are mean to each other, not threads about threads are tolerated and you are not allowed to mention anything said before on the boards at all. All these things will result in deletion and warnings.

I have been a member for years (before mumsnet even). There was a particularly nasty thread that was allowed to go on for pages which ended with a woman referring to children with LDs as 'being tapped in the head'..

I started a seperate thread wanting to discuss the use of disabilist language on the site and asking why words like bitch, whore and piss were not allowed yet retard, mong and spaz were.

I was told that some people might think it was ok to use those words so they couldnt filter them out, it wouldnt be fair.

I continuned to question this in a firm but polite manner and have now discovered I have been sent a message telling me that my style of posting is offensive and I have been taken straight to a final warning!

Not that I give a toss, the site is crap. I guess I am taken aback that you can be pretty much threatened into silence if you dare question the mods on this HUGE and well known site.

Its an issue that means a lot to me. If it was a site on which everything went language wise I wouldnt have bothered. But on this prissy site where you cant say bugger - you can call something retarded or monged out with no bother.

I think its bollocks and makes me glad I have mumsnet to come and tell people to fuck off on. Grin

OP posts:
2shoes · 17/08/2011 21:40

seems mn is going the same way as nm as they now seem to delete posts that call someone a troll, but allow disablist terms to stay!!

BornSicky · 17/08/2011 21:41

because i'm sad and a little bit anal, I just counted.

There are 57 forum message posting rules for Netmums!

57

seriously?

youarekidding · 17/08/2011 21:42

Just read the thread.

Fell about laughing at 'one would like to know' ONE? WTF. Bit too posh for me I think, you'd know I didn't fit in from post 1. Grin

Bohica · 17/08/2011 21:54

I have a (2) after my name. Does that mean I ain't common then? Grin

EllenJaneisnotmyname · 17/08/2011 22:04

Oops got a bit distracted. Didn't mean you, MMM! I can't find any 'fun' threads on NM, it's too hard to read, makes my eyes hurt. [wimp]

youarekidding · 17/08/2011 22:05

I have a 4 after mine so I ain't common either. Just different innit. Wink

Verahaspurpletwuntypants · 17/08/2011 22:06

Common as muck I'm afraid. Wink

It's a counting the members thing. Goes in a cycle. I was 368 or something like that.

smugtandemfeeder · 17/08/2011 22:08

Ellen NM does seem rather boring compared to MN. This is probably the most exciting thing that's happened on there for a long time.

backwardpossom · 17/08/2011 22:11

Who is Fanj O (no number - one and only)? Round of applause!

youarekidding · 17/08/2011 22:11

SOMEONE LIKED MY POST Shock

Fucking get in there Grin

Grin
TimeForMeIsFree · 17/08/2011 22:11

Tis indeed boring. So easy to run rings round em all too Grin

TimeForMeIsFree · 17/08/2011 22:13

I'm liking lot's of posts which are obviously mumsnetters I am loving that little 'like' button. I want one!

fanks · 17/08/2011 22:13

I think you will find I also have no number

EllenJaneisnotmyname · 17/08/2011 22:13

Link, link, pretty please.

youarekidding · 17/08/2011 22:18

I'm not obviously a MNer. I joined years ago so I just discovered by looking at my info. Grin knew I was a memeber obviously but never used it as couldn't get into it. MN on the other hand......................

TimeForMeIsFree · 17/08/2011 22:18

Number? I thought that number was my age, 46. But then I just realised that would make RachelB 792! Grin

slightlymad72 · 17/08/2011 22:19

1041, can you get anymore common? I think I hold the crown Grin

insanityscatching · 17/08/2011 22:20

link Ellen

StrandedBear · 17/08/2011 22:21

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

EllenJaneisnotmyname · 17/08/2011 22:22

Thank you!

TimeForMeIsFree · 17/08/2011 22:22

So, dare I ask, what is the number for? What does it represent? Have I been tagged, like a prize cow?

EllenJaneisnotmyname · 17/08/2011 22:23

Bugger, it's gone!

insanityscatching · 17/08/2011 22:24

What's gone?

thefirstMrsDeVere · 17/08/2011 22:25

I have no number. I am the one and only

I feel Rachel is becoming increasingly desperate to prove her point and her 'wont someone think of the microbiologists' argument isnt really working out.

OP posts:
fanks · 17/08/2011 22:25

Still there for me!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.