aibu to say that batman is not actually a superhero?

[spookshowangel]

because he doesn't have any super powers. seems obvious to me he is a vigilant style hero with cool gadgets.
seriously if having coll gadgets made you a super hero then bond would be one...am i wrong?

YANBU. He's not a Superhero by the proper definition.

Oh, and also?

NEEEEEEE-EEEEEEEERD.

Apparently he is!

YANBU

He doesn't have any superhuman powers - Rules him out of the superhero stuff!

YAB completely unreasonable. Have you seens Michael Keaton in that film?

If I were still a geeky teenager it would be lightsabers at dawn for a comment like that!
He's the BEST superhero because he's not one (coming from a Marvel Fangirl, that hurt to type).

Batman is a scientist.

Oooh there's a very good point / question.

And looking at the Yahoo answer it's very convincing that Batman is, indeed, a super-hero.

Phew!

And now I'm googling images of Michael Keaton in a Batsuit. It's going to be a productive evening

Batman is very upset. But with his history, it's not surprising.

thats just fan boy love explaining away the fact that he is a mere mortal. lets be fair he has millions of pounds to buy fantastic suits that make him harder to kill etc and gadgets that make him good in a fight but you have him and superman naked in a fight we all know batman is going down because he may have buffed up. but there is no super in him just science. they write bat man into those things and give him a fair chance because he is popular. so that also make s iron man not a super hero either.
god i do sound like a nerd dont i

That would also mean Ironman wouldn't be a superhero either, wouldn't it?

Nah, he's just a bloke with cool toys.

so this says i am wrong,Interestingly, the term "superhero" has been traced back to its first appearance in a 1942 story by Joe Simon and Jack Kirby, when it was used to describe the costumed character "the Guardian," who also had no "super-powers." The term "super" is a coinage of the 1920s, when iit came into vogue as a contraction of the word "superior" and should not be construed as always meaning something beyond the ability of ordinary humans; "super" does not have to be synomymous with "impossible." Note that in the link below, it is clearly stated that "characters need not have actual superhuman powers to be deemed superheroes." Batman is also served up there as an example of one of the world's best known "superheroes," and he is the prototype of scores of costumed heroes who have no superhuman powers. Clearly, Batman qualifies as a "superhero" and opinions to the contrary are exactly that, mere opinions, and may be ignored with a clear conscience.
but this is wrong since i just found the word originated from 1917 bahahaha

Just googled and Iron Man is a superhero so it seems you can be a superhero if you are just a normal bloke wearing a fancy suit!

YANBU, I have this argument with DP aaallllll the time!

spookshowangel, Iron Man DID gain superpowers at some point, something to do with how his body reacts with the generator he puts into his chest. If I remember correctly he gained the ability to heal quicker.

Anyhoo, Batman is cooler than Ironman.
About this Superman vs Batman naked fight?

Of all the superheros - I would do batman first.

i did wonder about the arc reactor, i thought it only kept his heart beating/ kept the scrapnal out.

yh me too catgirl - he has a cool cave that has to count for something