takethatlady her witness statement in court stated that she wanted to publicise the relationship in the Sun (plus the Mail, the Mirror and some others). The court proceedings were started when her story (orchestrated by her publicist Max Clifford) appeared in The Sun.
The latest court decision makes interesting reading:
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2011/1232.html
To be clear - the interim injunction is only put in place pending a full hearing where the court will rule on the allegations of blackmail.
"The evidence before the court at that stage, therefore, appeared to indicate, rightly or wrongly, that Ms Thomas had arranged for photographs to be taken, having already agreed a payment or payments from the newspaper. Despite that, she was still requesting £100,000 from the Claimant. This was the background against which I had decided that there was ample reason not to trust Ms Thomas."
"At all events, it seems probable that she had agreed at some point to contribute to the story in The Sun that was published in its issue for 14 April (i.e. prior to the hearing of the injunction application). It is thus ironic that Ms Thomas has subsequently complained of the court's supposed unfairness in according anonymity to the Claimant but not to her"