DD is 2, ex-h lives 350miles away, it's a 6hr car journey minimum, each way.
Ex sees DD when he likes (I've made it clear to him he can have access whenever he likes, and we make accommodation arrangements for him, which he doesnt have to pay for), I try and do whatever I can to facilitate his access.
Ex has decided that he wants DD to stay with him, not regularly, just 'whenever he decided', and only for 2-3 nights at a time because he is 'busy'.
Now, when DD is older, school age, and she is able to express a wish to stay with her dad, and mature enough to understand etc I'd love for her to go and spend a week in the school hols, for example, staying with him. But at 2yrs old, it just feels inappropriate - she wouldn't understand why she was there, she would be away from home and everything that feels familiar to her, and it would mean over 12hrs in a car (there and back) for just a few nights, it just feels like too much upheaval for an only-just-2yr old.
He doesn't even have anywhere for her to sleep, he lives with his parents and there is no spare space - he says she would sleep in their travel cot - but I know she has outgrown the travel cot, its the same as our old one and she is too tall for it.
Ex says this is all rubbish, "of course she wants to stay with me, she's mine", and I would be permitted to stay in a nearby hotel if I wanted (I would have to pay and make my own travel arrangements), and argues that I am taking DD on holiday in the summer, and it's 'exactly the same' - it's not, we're not going to be travelling for more than 3hrs tops, and she will have her own toddler bed in her own room while we're away, and more importantly she will be with people she is familiar with and her routine will be maintained.
AIBU in not wanting this for her at this age?