I don't remember the reference and I'm too tired to start hunting it down. This was not a study, but the result of meta-analysis of several
studies and of data gathered over 20 or more years relating to heart attack, stroke and (bowel?) cancer, among other conditions.
And I'm not saying we should give our dc all available drugs, just that alcohol is not the only drug we try to teach our children to use responsibly.
And of course it does not relate to toddlers - it relates to adults.
No, let's not give toddlers booze in their follow-on milk. Let's not give them follow-on milk at all, let's give them breastmilk or any other animal milk, or even no milk.
If my children at any age ask to have a sip of my drink, I let them. But I won't offer them a drink with their meal until they nearer adulthood. Until then, if they want to join us, they can have very dilute wine, or grape juice out of a pretty glass bottle. It will be in addition to their glass of water, and they will learn to drink it like wine: in sips, between mouthfuls of food.
"Kids that have drunk alcohol with the parents permission in moderation are just as likely to get hammered at Uni as those that come from a family that does not allow this. It doesnt stop anything you just expose them to it from a young age."
In the UK. I wonder whether this is true also in other countries.
BTW, teetotallers can get the benefits, too. Grapes eaten with the skin on, or grape juice made with the skins - most are, I think - are almost as protective as red wine. I think, but I'm not sure, that they have to be red grapes. So alcohol is not essential, but neither should it be entirely demonised.