...... it means that other people at the table must also obey them?
Ex-H was incredibly fussy, and obviously at home I had to serve meals that would suit us both (got used to it after a while, even though it meant no pasta/cheese/sauces etc etc). Not too much of a problem when we were together and it was only the two of us.
But, his food preferences would also extend out of the house, I wasn't allowed to order things in restaurants/cafes that he disliked (or hadn't had) as it 'would put him off if he knew it was there'. If I ever did he would fuss endlessly throughout the meal - made it a very uncomfortable experience.
We have a DD but have lived apart since she was 4m old. I weaned her onto things I eat (not to spite him I promise!) and she eats a varied diet and loves cheese, pasta, sauces, mayo (strangely!). She is also little and its important that she eats a well balanced meal or she doesn't gain weight.
Problem is arising because now when ex visits he will take DD for lunch, they came back the other day and he said that she hadn't eaten lunch - I asked what she'd had, it was plain bread with ham no spread (same as ex-h). I asked whether there was anything else she could have had, he just said 'no nothing suitable or that I could put up with'.
So, does a fussy eater become excessive when they also insist that other diners on their table only eat what they would eat?
On a similar note, I have a vegan friend (nothing against vegans!) who was coming to a group dinner party, I asked them what they like so I could prepare them a vegan dish and they said that they expected the whole party meal to be vegan as it was only fair that he could have everything on the table and not 'be discriminated against'.......