"Are you saying that a higher percentage of formula fed babies will end up with hospital admissions"
Yes
FF babies are more likely to see their GP and be admitted to hospital than exclusively bf babies, even when social class and education of parents is controlled for.
"is the nastiness that has been spouted at those who have had a dreadful time while either trying to feed their babies, or have tried and tried and tried, but have just been unable to"
Other than my comment about 'competitive suffering' (which I'll admit wasn't the kindest), what other 'nastiness' has been 'spouted' towards these mothers?
I don't recall seeing anything that is personally critical of their choices.
"I am a woman in both camps having done 2 of my children with BF and two FF, there is no difference in the general, day to day intelligence between my children."
Sorry to be rude but.....DUH! You know that bf may make a difference of between 3 to 6 points on IQ? Unless your children are identical twins who've lived completely identical lives, and then been IQ tested under controlled conditions - how on earth would you be able to measure what difference your feeding choices may have made to their cognitive development?
"this thread does little to promote BF in calm and sensitive way to those that are struggling"
If you want to hear things that promote breastfeeding in a 'sensitive way to those who are struggling', then bog off to one of the bf support lines/ support threads on the bf board on mumsnet. This is a discussion/debate forum and we're talking about the benefits (or otherwise) of breastfeeding.
OK - it's all about context, innit!
"let alone anybody who on arrival was told "it was formula wot did it,we have 100% proof".
Even people who smoke who get lung cancer don't have 100% proof that it was fags that caused the disease and not something else. If they did cigarette companies would have been sued out of existence by now!