Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To Want My XIL To Stop 'Correcting' DD's Grammar

21 replies

xstitch · 17/02/2011 20:36

It is driving me bonkers. I have tried objecting but according to them I am being irrational and not capable of recognising correct grammar.

I admit I am not an expert but here are some examples of their corrections:

  1. They want her to say 'I have tooked' instead of 'I have taken'
  2. The plural of goose is gooses
  3. Dashy things (apostrophes) are only used by idiots like Mummy.
  4. Wurr instead or our.

There are more but I am too annoyed to type any more.

OP posts:
Aims80 · 17/02/2011 20:39

I don't understand a word of that

manicbmc · 17/02/2011 20:40

Hmm seriously?

Blatherskite · 17/02/2011 20:40

Well, all their "corrections" are wrong so YANBU

VerylazyBecsy · 17/02/2011 20:41

they are wrong- sounds like they have a regional dialect- which is not bad in itself- but they should not be correcting your child's very correct grammar.

put them straight- tell them they will confuse your DD and that they are being VU.

stoppingat2 · 17/02/2011 20:42

this is a wind up..clearly

altinkum · 17/02/2011 20:42

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LoopyLiz88 · 17/02/2011 20:42

yanbu at all

PaisleyLeaf · 17/02/2011 20:42

Have you heard these corrections from them or your DD?
It sounds like a misunderstanding surely.

fedupofnamechanging · 17/02/2011 20:42

So, they are teaching her incorrect grammar?

I remember some of your other threads and I know you've had very bad luck with your ex and your ILs. My advice is to get a good solicitor to undo some of the restrictions you find yourself living under and get DD away from these people as soon as possible.

xstitch · 17/02/2011 20:42

I have Becsy :(. They say I need to stop speaking funny as it is me who is confusing her.

OP posts:
Eglu · 17/02/2011 20:45

Do they understand English at all? Seriously they talk crap. How old is your DD?

xstitch · 17/02/2011 20:45

No it is not a wind up. Some I have heard them say others I have been told by dd. I wish it was a wind up but this is kind of how my life tends to go.

altinkum tbh that is quite mild compared to their other attempts to undermine me. I am feeling particularly sensitive about the grammar issue tonight after the 'fun' I had with her reading book earlier.

OP posts:
VerylazyBecsy · 17/02/2011 20:49

ggrrrrrr i feel for you Wine. hard one. i take it they have her unsupervised, can this be changed? at least if you could pull them up about it every time it happens they might at some point start to get the picture.

manicbmc · 17/02/2011 20:51

If they are being that unreasonable can you not make them go through court for a contact order?

xstitch · 17/02/2011 20:51

Tried to change it. Courts say I have to let them have unsupervised access. I am not giving up though, I suspect things may end up in court again.

OP posts:
stoppingat2 · 17/02/2011 20:57

Which region you in? Wurr = scottish. Wor = Geordie!

fedupofnamechanging · 17/02/2011 21:01

I think you are being screwed over by the court system here, and in your position I would welcome going back to court. GPs who undermine the mother should not be having unsupervised access. Anyway, she's your child not theirs and I don't think they should be entitled to jack shit if you don't want it.

I really wish I was a solicitor so I could help you. Have you asked for help in Legal, cos there may be someone who can help you.

VerylazyBecsy · 17/02/2011 21:05

Could you just not let them have unsupervised access? I know this is v v controversial, but the courts aren't exactly going to anything about it??? what could they do? You could get one of those detective pens which have microphones and use it as evidence if it got back to the courts- dont know if this entirely legal either. i would though tbh.

xstitch · 17/02/2011 21:13

I'm in Scotland.

Unfortunately becsy they would take me back to court again and try and get full custody for XH with no access for me. They have done it once so they would do it again.

OP posts:
VerylazyBecsy · 17/02/2011 21:42

I would get the evidence that they are behaving inappropriately and some good legal advice. I don't see that they would have a leg to stand on. Every parent has the right to protect their child. Agree with karmabeliever completely.

solooovely · 18/02/2011 14:03

Why do you have to give the grandparents unsupervised access? That's unusual isn't it?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread