SimplyTes, yes, I am still here, and I am still reading (slowly).
I have, believe it or not, been paying very close attention to this thread, and have been mulling the replies over the course of the day.
I'm happy to admit my mistake when it comes to "income" vs. relative income (depending on where you are in the country) along with a few other points raised in the thread. It was rude of me to say "most" MNers, not "some", etc.
However, as the OP, I do veer away from replying too much in this thread, as it appears either I have explained myself poorly or I am genuinely being unreasonable - both, I think, need some reflection on how I approach things here.
I am more than frustrated at the number of posters who seem to have created this straw man idea that I've said "anyone who earns more than 70k is loaded, you have nothing to complain about", essentially - that wasn't the original point of the thread. At all. It was more to do with those who are complaining about being skint by being unable to afford many things families in this country still perceive as luxuries i.e. from the thread that prompted it, when the OP moaned about not even being able to save £450 a mount, without realising that this is the take-home pay for a large chunk of people here, who do work hard, who haven't had the opportunity, support or natural aptitude to be able to pursue a career paying more than £6 or £7 an hour... and, well, me thinking that perhaps those in a better position should consider themselves thankful for their lot.
I also
at the number of posters who seem to think that high wages = hard worker. And that if we want more money, we just have to work more/make better choices.
The simplicity of that attitude astounds me, hence why I'm not sure if it's a productive use of my time to continue to enflame things via this thread.
Perhaps I am guilty of the inverse snobbery others have spoken about. We all make our choices in life, and perhaps I'm too bitter to discuss this topic with an unbiased mind :)