Here we go.
Look, it's pointless to pretend that looking after kids isn't work. I am doing both at the moment, with a bit of study chucked in.
There are pros and cons to working in and out of the home. Yes, here I can sit on my arse if I feel like it and no one oversees what I do. However, that's as true of full-time paid research (and, I'm sure, other jobs) as it is of being a parent at home.
*HappyMummyOfOne", as for tasks undertaken at home being "all things we do as adults and parents", I'm presuming that's designed to be inflammatory. This discussion is so value-laden, always. Paid work takes time. Domestic work takes time. If you do one of these tasks, it reduces time for the other. There should be no judgement attached to that. It's a simple equation.
Similarly, being in work out of the home reduces the amount of domestic work that needs to be completed. If I do my usual evening chores on a Monday night, and am working Tuesday, I come home to a tidy home on Tuesday evening. If I do the same chores on Tuesday evening, and am not at work on Wednesday, the place is a tip by 10am. And 12. And 2. Hence, you do more housework and childcare when at home. When at work, others do childcare tasks that would take up your time if you were in the home.
If a couple make an agreement about domestic responsibilities for a period of time, it doesn't make sense that the joint agreement equates to "actual work" for one party and - what? - "pretend work" for the other. It is a bit insulting as it diminishes the agreement, as though one party were doing something more valuable than the other.
Things need to be done. Families work out how to address this fact jointly and in different ways that suit their circumstances, personally, socially and financially. All this grandstanding about what is and isn't work makes no sense.