I have namechanged for this.
I foster two siblings on a long term basis.
This may sound crazy but when they first came to me I had doubts about who the boys father was. This was because when I was pregnant my midwife noticed my husband has a double crown. She told me that a double crown was the only genetic trait that is always inherited and that ds would have one. When he eventually grew hair he had a double crown, as does fil.
Anyway I don't know if her theory is true but I noticed that the boy had a double crown but his father and sister did not. As I had a good relationship with SW I mentioned this. She confirmed that there had been doubts and the mother had originally wanted a DNA test. After she and the second man involved were beaten up by the alleged father she withdrew her consent for DNA testing.
That was two years ago. I have since learnt that it is commonly accepted by the family and friends that child is not the birth son of this man.
So:
Mother and alleged father are back together in a very violent relationship.
Child has contact with the man he knows as his father.
Child is very scared of man, doesn't like going to contact and often says his daddy is a bad man.
I think the child has a right to know that this man isn't his birth father. I believe it will come out one day anyway as so many people know. And I think it would be less harmful if it is done in a kind and controlled way.
SS are not keen to open a can of worms which will probably result in more violence towards the mother and could be upsetting for both siblings.
So thank you if you have got this far and what do you think?.