Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to be worried about my daughter's weight?

102 replies

BigFatPudding · 13/12/2010 12:23

My daughter is 14 months and weighs about 14 kilos - that is just over 30 pounds, or about 2 stone 2 pounds.

She is off the centile charts, by a fair bit, in that she'd have to maintain her weight for 6 months or so to even hit the 99.8th centile.

She weighed 12kg (1 stone 12) at 6 months of age, then her growth levelled a fair bit and she weighed about 13 and a half kilos (2 stone 1) at just under a year old.

She is also off the chart tall, but that only means a bit, in that she still looks very rotund, with incredibly thick thighs, so thick that I can't really dress her in jeans - even size 2 simply dont fit around her upper thighs. She's a tunic and leggings kind of girl for the time being.

She got there on milk alone really, in that she was weaned at 6 months, by which time she was already 12 kilos. She was formula fed due to the fact that nobody could get her to latch on in hospital, tried everything including the newborn belly crawl, skin to skin, etc, and in fact at the point we decided to let her try some formula from a bottle (about 2 days old when she'd had nothing and they were threatening SCBU) she wasn't really interested in that either - she was 9 pounds 2 born, yet not a hungry baby, and in those early days if anything I was worried about her weight plummeting. Oh the irony!

She she ended up formula fed, I never "overfed" her as such from the point of view that generally speaking, apart from the odd growth spurt when she'd demand an extra bottle in the course of the day, she'd drink the amount that was given as a guidance on the back of the formula tin for her age.

She didn't take to weaning that well, needed to be encouraged a bit, though got better at eating as she approached her birthday. She now eats 3 meals a day and has a bottle of cows milk in the morning and a bottle in the evening of about 6oz each but no snacks. At the same age, her brother would be having 3 meals, 2 snacks, and if you didn't feed him bang on midday and bang on 5pm he'd roar the place down. My daughter is no such child - she can wait till whenever before she eats.

She eats no "junk" - we never go to McDonalds, have chocolate buttons, I dont give her biscuits, she has cereal for breakfast (Oatibix, generally) some kind of lentil or chickpea dish for lunch, or a sandwich if we are out and about, 50/50 bread spread with a little light philadelphia with onion and chives and a little turkey ham, and I generally offer her a banana for "pudding". Dinner is generally some meat like chicken, with vegetables, a corn cob, some mash, or some fish with the same, that kind of thing. If she has a drink, its water, or water with a dash of orange juice or apple juice, but that is generally only with lunch and I'll give her that same drink to finish with dinner. She doesn't really drink a lot of fluid.

The portions are the same kind of portions that I see my friends giving their normal-weight children, I have baby plates and cutlery, she really doesn't take that much and a lot of it ends up on the floor.

She's been seen recently by the HV and our GP and neither have concerns about her weight on the basis that she will probably level out when she starts walking, which she nearly is, and they (thankfully) believe me when I tell them what she eats and in what quantities.

With all that in mind though, am I being unreasonable to still feel concerned for her? How did she get to be so fat on what most babies would not get fat on? What does this mean for her in the future? Does it mean she will never be able to enjoy biscuits, chocolate, a glass of wine or 3, a Friday pizza or Saturday curry without piling on the pounds?

I'm sure other parents who dont know me think I'm overfeeding her or feeding her crap. I am on the chunky side, overweight but not obese, I am just under a stone overweight, I wear a size 14, 12 top mostly. Her father is BMI 24.9, so one cupcake away from being overweight on the charts (!) he wears a 32 waist trouser and looks fine, no pot belly or anything, thin face etc.

I dont really care what other people think of me really, to be honest, as I know what I'm doing, and I'm doing my best, but AIBU to be concerned? What would you do if you had a child with these stats? Would you do anything differently?

OP posts:
NemoTheRedNosedFish · 13/12/2010 13:39

I agree with the other posters saying try not to worry.

My dd was 8lb 6 oz at birth and has always had a good appetite, sometimes eating us out of house and home, sometimes a bit more 'picky' but she has, iirc, only missed about 7 meals in her entire life!

She's four and a half now, and weighs 2stone and 2 pounds Confused

She is average height (but keeps on shooting p atm) but never seems to fill out very much! I keep a check on how much / little I can see her ribs / shoulder blades when I bath her. Smile There is such huge natural variation between children, it's unreal.

MumNWLondon · 13/12/2010 13:40

kenobi - my son is average weight, and next clothes still huge, which was my point on the other thread - I guess the point I was making here that the weight would be more typical at 3-3.5 rather than 14 months.

I did say though that whilst ok for the OP to be slightly worried - but probably best to see how things are in 6-8 months once she has been walking for a bit.

Bunnyjo · 13/12/2010 13:41

OP - YANBU to be concerned, but your DD's diet sounds healthy and you've been seeking advice from your HV and GP. Your GP would have referred you, if he thought that your DD's weight gain was excessive. Your DD was a bigger baby (9lb 2oz), so her weight gain is less surprising than if your DD was a small baby when born.

Most advice I read at the time my DD was that age said that the weight of a baby roughly doubles by 6mth (meaning your DD would weigh around 18lb 4oz) and by 1yr most babies are 2.5-3.5 times their birth weight which, in your DD's case would mean a range from 22lb 14oz to 31lb 14oz). When you compare your DD to those figures, she looks absolutely fine.

My daughter was born on the 50th and shot up to the 90th, she was breastfed too - the bf midwife actually asked me to donate some milk to their milkbank as mine 'was obviously gold top and not skimmed!' which I did - but that's another thread altogether! She stayed around the 90th until she began walking, then her weight seemed to remain constant for quite a few months after she became mobile. Now, at 3.3, she is just above the 50th for weight and height and she looks perfectly in proportion.

Try not to worry - I know, it is far easier said than done, but you're doing all the right things Xmas Smile

kenobi · 13/12/2010 13:47

MumNW - Fair enough.

Bunnyjo, that's really useful, thank you

(Sorry BFB, I'll stop hijacking your thread!)

narkypuffin · 13/12/2010 13:47

Centile charts are purely a reflection of other babies weight and height. They are not a guide to how things should be.

Even if a particular baby was on say 25th for height and weight that doesn't necessarily mean that the child is healthy- they could still be underfed or overfed. A child can be on the 99th for height and the 25th for weight and be healthy and appropriately fed or vice versa.

Lynli · 13/12/2010 13:56

My DS was like this, and he did lose weight when he started walking at 15 months, which is probably quite late.

He is now 10 years and it is an ongoing battle, he is just slightly overweight, but I keep him very active to maintain it.

It is unfortunate that some people gain weight far easier than others.

BigFatPudding · 13/12/2010 13:58

Thanks for all these replies ladies. To answer the poster who asked me how tall she was, 90cm long, which is way off the chart. A 99.6th centile baby for height would be 80cm at that age.

OP posts:
Bunnyjo · 13/12/2010 14:05

kenobi - you are very welcome Xmas Smile

narkypuffin - I completely agree. Centile charts are only part of the picture, they can give an indication that there is something wrong, but they are not the only factor which is taken into consideration.

BFP - just to add, my DD is 33mth, is 15.8kg and 101cm. Your DD sounds fine x

Bunnyjo · 13/12/2010 14:06

Oops, I meant she is 39mth... I blame the pregnancy hormones!

monkeyflippers · 13/12/2010 14:07

Wow she weighs more then my 4.5 year old (who in underweight). I feed mine as much as I possibly can get her to eat and give her treats all the time and macDonalds etc and she just won't put on weight. I think a lot of the time they just are the way they are!

I agree that it should even out when she starts walking.

Out of interest are you a big woman?

ThinneverVetch · 13/12/2010 14:07

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

santander · 13/12/2010 14:11

My god I was sooooo fat as a baby. I can't believe the photos i was gigantic.

flick a bit further through the album and I just started looking like all the other toddlers and now I'm 8 stone and 5foot 6.

Me mindful of her diet but don't worry I'd say.

Good luck xx

leeloo1 · 13/12/2010 14:12

"To answer the poster who asked me how tall she was, 90cm long, which is way off the chart. A 99.6th centile baby for height would be 80cm at that age."

D'oh, well there you go then, she is naturally taller/bigger. My DS was the same (as I originally typed then deleted the post by mistake) and was like a little sumo wrestler before he started walking at around 14 months... especially as I use cloth nappies, which add bulk. He went up through clothing sizes really quickly - I was despairing and started buying huge clothes 2-3 and 3-4... which he is still wearing now (with less turn ups), as once he got to 18 months he just stopped growing outwards and started growing upwards. He's now a very gorgeous in proportion toddler! :)

narkypuffin · 13/12/2010 14:12

If you are worried by the charts...

For her height- 90cm - to appear on the girls' chart you have to go to age 19.5 months.

For 19.5 months her current weight is within the chart and on a lower centile than her height.

narkypuffin · 13/12/2010 14:14

And those are centile measurements for children who are (mostly) running about!

jessiealbright · 13/12/2010 14:15

So, basically, she's just big for her age! Her weight sounds in proportion to her height.

Try to stop worrying about her weight. I don't want to be unkind, but many people's food issues stem from how their parents treated it, and you could be getting yourself into a bad mindset. Which you might struggle to get out of, later.

She's a tall girl, as you've said. She will lose weight with walking. My boys went from 75th centile to 25th because of their enthusiasm for their newfound mobility. Their waists and thighs have shrunk so much.

winnybella · 13/12/2010 14:17

Ah-90cm- on the charts I've seen the ratio height/weight is ok. I wouldn't worry too much then.

ChippingIn · 13/12/2010 14:17

BFP - please stop worrying. When she starts running around it will fall off of her. You'll be posting where can I get jeans for my tall DD that don't fall off of her! Grin

Whether this means she is 'the type' to look at a cream cake and put on a stone or 'the type' to eat what she like and not put on an ounce is already part of her make up and there's nothing you can do to change that.

However, you can give her issues about her weight/food/height if you don't stop worrying about it. Que sera sera - & worrying wont make it any better, but potentially worse.

She is going swimming, will soon be running around. She is having a good, healthy, balanced diet - enjoy her and stop stressing x

Bigmouthstrikesagain · 13/12/2010 14:23

OP my dd was 14kg at 1 yr and off the charts - I have just been looking at her red book (she is 4 1/2 now) and a proper buddha baby, complete with tummy and chunky thighs. I also stressed about her weight and sought reassurance from HV etc. I gave up on jeans etc. and stuck to dresses and leggings. In her second year (she started walking at 12 months exactly) she only gained 2 kg so was 16kg at 2 and back on the charts again, I am sure that is what will happen with your dd.

She is also 98-99th %ile for height and today she is still sturdy but still not off the charts (around 98-99th %ile) though she weighs the same as her six yo brother! Her build is sturdy and probably always will be, broad shoulders large feet and she still has a bit of her toddler tum, though her legs and arms are longer and slimmer - she towers over some of her classmates in reception.

We come in all shapes and sizes and as long as she has a good diet and an active life I will not be concerned. The people in my family are tall and big boned so I expect she will be too - a six footer probably.

BigFatPudding · 13/12/2010 14:26

Thanks ladies. Dont worry, I wont give her issues. I would never mention it to her, say "you can't eat that", bore her with nutritional info, put certain foods into certain categories, deny treats (when she's older - at the moment she doesn't miss chocolate anymore than she misses red wine because she doesn't know about it) or actively diet myself in front of her, if that makes sense. I plan to raise them as food being fuel, and happen to buy healthy food most the time and provide it but not go on about it, if that makes sense!

I would never let her think I was scrutinising her weight. I know it sounds like I weigh her a lot but I dont really - weighed her at 6 months because I had to check her car seat wasn't unsafe, at 1 year she was weighed for her developmental check and I weighed her this morning because my husband expressed concern - I think he's put me in this mindset to be honest - but she wont know she was weighed, all she knows is that I picked her up and stood on a square piece of glass, if that (at 14 months I doubt she's congnitive - though she is very advanced Wink )...

OP posts:
altinkum · 13/12/2010 14:27

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

bessie26 · 13/12/2010 14:31

ah, she's fine - as the others have said her weight is in proportion to her height, so stop worrying! (don't give the girl a complex already!)

Once she starts running around the chubbiness will drop off & you will miss those little pudgy knees Grin

well done you for raising a child who eats such good healthy food!

kenobi · 13/12/2010 14:36

BFP - are you me? Am I having an out of body experience?! That's the same height as DD...

Is your DD dark blonde and likes hugging?! I've just posted a pic of her on my site if you want to look.

kenobi · 13/12/2010 14:37

By site I mean mumsnet profile...

GooseyLoosey · 13/12/2010 14:46

If you keep engaging with medical professionals I wouldn't worry for now. If she has not slimmed down a bit after she has been walking for a while I would talk to them again.

For what its worth, ds was under the 50th centile for weight when he was born. He then ploughed an almost vertical line through them and was off the charts by 6 months. He is now 7 and was referred to as looking like a "racing snake" last week!