to be amused by this bit of terrible photoshopping

[cakewench]

www.johnlewis.com/101947/Style.aspx

I realise we're all meant to believe that the skinny photoshopped models are just as thin as they appear in the photos, but perhaps you could at least put the girls legs back in the right place when you're done with her??

www.johnlewis.com/101947/Style.aspx

clickable link.. sorry!

??

oh gawd

there's that fabulous website that regularly adds photo shop disasters - I can't remember what it's called though

that looks very strange!!

oh yes that would be - ermm photoshop disasters - which has actually got this one on it's blog

ooh I have heard of that blog! Will have to google it.

:o

I can't see it? Hasn't she just pushed her hips to one side?

no they have deffo choppped her in half and tried to stick her back together.

it is easier to see on the zoom whenskie

She needs to see a chiropractor about that

She's not been chopped in half!!!! She's just a skinny bird standing funny in an odd sized jacket!!

I still can't see it?

But I could never do those magic eye things either...

I'm with Rioja on this one. She's wearing a very puffy jacket that is not running with the contours of her body.

She's definitely wonky

I used to be thin like her and can't see anything wronmg with it, apart from obviously the clothes are a bit horrid and not very flattering, but there is no way that she's been photoshopped. Why would they bother?

When I first looked I thought ?? But the more you look the more her body shape looks all wrong. She's have to have a really really high waist for that to be even vaguely right.

I feel pretty much the same as Hulababy. I looked at it for ages (okay, maybe that's my problem!!) and it just seems so unnatural.

I will concede that I do not know for absolute sure that it is photoshopped, so if you disagree with me, that's fine. ;) It's still a wonky pic, though.

Definitely photoshopped. As Hula said, if she is not then she has a 30cm waist. Look at where her hips are and where the belt is buckled, ie. where her waist is.

actually looking closer I don't tink they've chopped her legs off and re-aligned them - i think they've tried to shrink her waist on the right hand side )to get that nice gap between waist and arm) and in the process forgot to shrink her hip on that side

\link{http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=s7v1.scene7.com/is/image/JohnLewis/000101943%3F%24fash_product%24&imgrefurl=www.johnlewis.com/101943/Style.aspx&usg=___LJO3i4i5CHaYGUpq_8wztI-gUA=&h=534&w=400&sz=29&hl=en&start=30&zoom=1&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=6fMi0E0ezatKlM:&tbnh=132&tbnw=99&prev=/images%3Fq%3DBelstaff%2BMilford%2BWaxed%2BCotton%2BJacket,%26start%3D18%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-gb:IE-SearchBox%26ndsp%3D18%26tbs%3Disch:1\Shes here again} - different pose but still the really long waist - maybe she is just a really wierd shape?

Oddly if you do a google image search for that jacket she comes up in every photo! Does noone else ever model it?

Well, I don't think her shape has been photoshopped, but it definetly teaches you not to spend nearly a grand on a jacket that people will think you look strange in!

I think the jacket's just really stiff so is taking on a shape of its own. She's really skinny and has her hips pushed to one side.

well actually to be correct those that think she's an odd shaped don't think she's been badly photoshopped..........almost every advertising image/magazine image you see will have been photoshopped to some degree..........it's whtehr they make a disaster of it or not that makes the difference