Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that BOTH parents

51 replies

bratnav · 19/10/2010 13:45

Should be informed and agree if their child is going to be photographed and featured in a national newspaper?

OP posts:
MadreInglese · 19/10/2010 13:46

no, not neccessarily

vbusymum1 · 19/10/2010 13:48

depends, are they together or separated ?If they're together then I think its OK for the newspaper to assume that one parent speaks for both.

bratnav · 19/10/2010 13:48

Ok probably need to add more details so it's not AIBU by stealth.

DSDs mum keeps appearing in national newspapers (with photos of her and DSD) on random subjects. I have no idea why and she has never asked if DH is happy with it (which he's not). What the heck is she up to? Not that it makes any difference, but for fullness we have joint residency.

OP posts:
LionOnTheFloorInAPoolOfBlood · 19/10/2010 13:49

Back story here?

Would have though any person with parental responsibility should be able to give permission, as with anything else.

ragged · 19/10/2010 13:49

Do newspapers need a person's consent in order to publish their picture, even a child's photo? I would imagine not, so I reckon you're on a hiding to nothing.

proudnscary · 19/10/2010 13:50

No you only need one guardian/parent's permission I believe.

But I would be very put out indeed if I was your dh.

I can't even bear my mother putting pix of the dc on the dreaded Facebook.

bratnav · 19/10/2010 13:50

She is giving interviews, so obviously she is consenting.

OP posts:
LionOnTheFloorInAPoolOfBlood · 19/10/2010 13:51

OK x-post

So I think your DH needs to take it up with her if he has concerns.

vbusymum1 · 19/10/2010 13:52

Is she doing it to get paid maybe or just because she likes it ?

There's probably a legal answer (not necessary) and a moral one (probably best to)

bratnav · 19/10/2010 13:53

I agree that he needs to talk to her about it, any time he mentions anything that he is concerned about he is 'controlling her'.

OP posts:
bratnav · 19/10/2010 14:10

No idea why she I doing it. She's in PR workwise so maybe she just has lots of journalist contacts?

OP posts:
2rebecca · 19/10/2010 14:15

My son ended up in local paper a couple of times without any one's permission so I think no is the answer to your question. He wasn't named in either, a photographer just happened to be around at the activity he was in. He was delighted to be in the paper.
I would let it go unless she's slagging you off in the paper.

bratnav · 19/10/2010 14:23

But this isn't random photos in the local rag, this is her giving interviews and posed photos with the 2 of them. I think that makes it slightly different. All my DCs have been in the local paper when they had a special project on at their school, I have no problem with that.

The articles are about her and DHs marriage/divorce, her new partner and their relTionship, pensions as a divorced woman, things to do in our city with kids, a posed photo with her, DSD, her partner anda random toddler advertising a competition on the front of a national newspaper. All of the articles are in national papers.

OP posts:
nancydrewrocked · 19/10/2010 14:27

Don't really see the problem.

PerpetuallyAnnoyedByHeadlice · 19/10/2010 14:32

is it the parent the child lives with who is in the photos with them, and presumably gave their consent,if so whats the problem here? that parent has to make umpteeen decisions every day for that child - does exP need to be consulted on each one?

Parents of adopted kids/those involved in witness protection etc etc i can quite see why schools have to be careful about photos and names and where/if they appear in a public domain, but for an average child there is no issue IMO

bratnav · 19/10/2010 14:34

Perpetually- we have joint residency, DSD spends a week with us and a week with her Mum. It just doesn't sit well, DH feels very uncomfortable with DSD being exposed in the national press.

OP posts:
SolidButShamblingUndeadBrass · 19/10/2010 14:35

The fact that your DP doesn't like it doesn;t mean he has any right to put a stop to it. What the mother is doing is not demonstrably harmful in any way to the DC. Even if he was still married to her and living with her and the DC and she and the DC wanted to do this, he would have no legal way of stopping her from doing it. He can't make her 'obey' him.

MaMoTTaT · 19/10/2010 14:38

well I sent all 3 DS's forms for consent for photos etc back to school with ticks next to all the boxes.

I didn't consult exH on the matter......

PerpetuallyAnnoyedByHeadlice · 19/10/2010 14:39

if she's doing it to annoy/get at your Dp shell be delighted that its working

really though, i dont see your DPs problem. What does he think will happen? Or is it just his "lack of control" of the situation he finds frustrating?

2rebecca · 19/10/2010 14:39

How old is your stepdaughter?

bratnav · 19/10/2010 14:40

'obey'? Blimey SGB, that is not what DH or I want, I'm just cNvassing opinion. Would any of you want your XP/H constAntly in the papers with photos with your child?

OP posts:
PerpetuallyAnnoyedByHeadlice · 19/10/2010 14:40

does his ex ask to be consulted on all the decisions he and you make for the DC while at your house? or lay down the law about what they can and cannot do? if this is so then he has a point

where would he draw the line about decisions he does/does not need to be in on?

GypsyMoth · 19/10/2010 14:42

but...but.....YOU have a photo of DSD on your profile here on MN!!!!!

bratnav · 19/10/2010 14:42

DSD is 6. If you google daily mail pension cinderellas you will find them there.

So did I MaMo, but that's for the school website and at a push the local paper.

OP posts:
ChasingSquirrels · 19/10/2010 14:45

I don't think I would have an issue with it

Swipe left for the next trending thread