Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Yay! Looks like Child Benefits are next on Dave's hitlist...

415 replies

cupcakesandbunting · 18/08/2010 16:55

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11009535

Speculation, my bum. Hmm We all know what's coming, Dave.

OP posts:
cupcakesandbunting · 19/08/2010 10:07

"Surely you did your sums before having children to check you could afford them?"

Erm, we did our sums to see if we could afford our child with what we were told we would be earning, the £80 from CB included. Why wouldn't we? If you take this argument to its logical conclusion then we should really have worked out if we could have afforded our child if DH lost his job/ if I lost my job/ if a new PM who strongly resembled Iggle Piggle was going to come and rob us blind when we weren't looking, but that last one was just a bad dream, right?

I do hope that when if Ravey Davey cuts CB for middle earners that this will be reflected in the amount of free childcare that we are entitled to per week so that I can actually work to top up to the amount lost? Hang on. That's going to be next, isn't it? I hope he's not reading this, don't want to be giving him ideas!

OP posts:
grumpypants · 19/08/2010 10:10

Haha, cupcakes i just came back to make exactly that first point! And what about those families earning nothing? Are they expected to have sat down wwith a calculator and worked out if they could afford a child without the jsa/income support/ whatever, leaving them with thin air? Is that ok? If that argument is going to be used, you can't pick and choose who you use it against.

BarmyArmy · 19/08/2010 10:10

Hammy02 - good point.

That's the thing - the very people who can't afford them are the very ones who crack on and sire them regardless.

It's well-known that the higher the educational attainment/income earnt, the later such women are likely to have children.

Those women at the bottom of this scale are far less likely to think twice about having children, not least because we are paying them to do so.

toccatanfudge · 19/08/2010 10:15

BA - you're "it's my riiight" to have a car argument is flawed.......as it's an international human right to be able to have a family..........funnily enough it's not a "right" to own a car

Alouiseg · 19/08/2010 10:16

There's a lot to be said for scrapping the vast majority of benefits and just giving us a realistic tax allowance. Higher rate tax kicks in far too early, and lets not forget that income tax was only supposed to be a temporary measure Hmm

toccatanfudge · 19/08/2010 10:18

pmsl @ brought in to help repopulate the country after the war - there was talk of some sort of welfare state before the war - it just all had to wait until we'd all stopped dropping bombs on each other

cupcakesandbunting · 19/08/2010 10:19

Why don't you just toddle off, BarmyArmy? You're nothing but a wind-up merchant.

We are responsible; we sat down with our calculator and pencil when I was pregnant and worked out what our income was. We worked out that we could only afford twelve hours childcare per week, so I work fifteen (mum has DS a few hours too). Only having a salary for fifteen hours wasn't so bad because I get the CB for essentials too. But that's going to be cut, cheers Dave.

So are you categorising us of being those who "crack on and sire them regardless"? If so, kindly fuck off. Two of us work, we are solvent.

OP posts:
tethersend · 19/08/2010 10:19

"Those women at the bottom of this scale are far less likely to think twice about having children, not least because we are paying them to do so."

Wow. They get pregnant on their own? If they can manage that, we should be supporting them.

Schoolboy error, BA.

toccatanfudge · 19/08/2010 10:20

Aouisieg - so what would be a realistic tax allowance? Bearing in mind that if you scrapped the things such as housing benefit, (one of the biggest expenditures after pensions) that without it there'd be no-one to keep you office clean if you live somewhere relatively expensive to live as they wouldn't be able to afford to house themselves there

toccatanfudge · 19/08/2010 10:22

oh yes tethers - I had my 3 boys TOTALLY on my own, no man involved, they were all immaculate conceptions Wink

tethersend · 19/08/2010 10:25

Well, that doesn't surprise me of you, toccata Grin

Alouiseg · 19/08/2010 10:27

No Tethersend the Fathers should be supporting them.

tethersend · 19/08/2010 10:29

BA doesn't mention fathers. He implies that women get pregnant alone.

Did you have time to think about the question I asked you further upthread, Alouiseg?

snoozathon · 19/08/2010 10:30

BarmyArmy

You totally ignored all my points, can you address them? Or are you just going to keep using insulting language about the poor, and reiterate your hatred of the welfare state?

cupcakesandbunting · 19/08/2010 10:31

BA is everything that I loathe about staunch Tory supporters.

OP posts:
Alouiseg · 19/08/2010 10:32

I started to think that 12k would be a good starting point for a tax allowance but our system is such an enormous mess it needs to be ripped down and reformed. More things need to be incentivized, instead of benefits we should be able to claim a tax refund on mortgage interest debt, healthcare, employing home "staff" Nannies, gardeners, cleaners.

I would take a leaf out of America's book and reward rather than penalise.

Alouiseg · 19/08/2010 10:34

The firefighter, teacher question? I thought I replied.

Alouiseg · 19/08/2010 10:35

The country is broke thanks to our prolific spending on benefits. Doesn't that tell you anything?

tethersend · 19/08/2010 10:36

I'll not hold my breath for that answer then, Alouiseg.

tethersend · 19/08/2010 10:36

x-post, sorry.

Did you? I couldn't see it... whereabouts?

tethersend · 19/08/2010 10:37

That's not why the country is broke

Wink
cupcakesandbunting · 19/08/2010 10:39

The scrapping of CB wouldn't be so bad if the government would make it easier for me to work decent hours. As it is, (as I said earlier) I can't afford more childcare than I do already. Losing that £80 p/month will make it pretty much essential that I find more hours at work/get another job. What do I do with DS/how do I pay for it? I am more than willing to make up that £80 by earning it. Come on, Dave. Do let me know.

OP posts:
Alouiseg · 19/08/2010 10:41

we should have let the banks fail! It would have been better to compensate the account holders than prop up an unsustainable company. :o

tethersend · 19/08/2010 10:42

Banks? What on earth have banks got to do with it?

I thought the country was broke thanks to our prolific spending on benefits?

Confused
snoozathon · 19/08/2010 10:42

This is what arguing with a Tory looks like:

"There are social problems that lead to unhappiness, crime, drugs and teen pregnancy"

Tory: "Yes! It's WRONG!!!1!!"

"Ok, how can we solve these problems?"

"It's WRONG! People should be happy, intelligent, well-behaved and make all the right choices, like me!"

"Yeah well they don't, let's accept that shall we and look at ways of improving the situation"

"NO! People should do right things not wrong ones!!!"

"Yes, it's a shame they don't, it causes problems. How about we try xyz? It will help alleviate social problems, which are caused by poverty"

[Tory self-combusts]