I've just been to my 'annual performance review' (although as it's only the third one in 10 years its level of annual-ness remains at question :) ) Things seemed to go well, although I feel like they were very down-downing my interest in promotion. I'm got to Senior Lecturer 5 years ago now (applied in my 4th year for promotion in my 5th), and would hope to go for Reader, which would involve absolutely no change in salary (thus no cost to the Uni). Back when I applied for SL you had to pick to go for that or Reader, although now if you go for Reader and 'fail' they might give you SL. I'm a bit annoyed about that, which came in place just the after I applied, as I would have definitely gone for Reader if they had done it that way then. I tried to get feedback on how they scored me (e.g., would I have made Reader if I'd gone for it), but didn't get any.
I said I was well aware that I need to get funding to apply for promotion, but their response was yes, and also get a few more publications, perhaps having funding for a few years first. That will take ages! And I'm actually being the most productive I have been since, actually, ever, coming out with 5 publications in the last 2 years (I was going to say since mat leave, but it truly is since ever!). There is no way I will get anything like that until a grant is nearly over and another spate of papers comes out, and that is assuming I get a new and steady crop of PhD students to work alongside it (as my last pre-mat leave PhD student just graduated). So we'd be looking another 5 years in the future at a minimum -- that would be working for 10 years at SL for a horizontal promotion (albeit with one mat leave). That seems a bit overkill to me, and I am planning to apply as soon as I get a grant, although I suppose I need my HoS support.
Those of you a little further on in your careers, what sort of track record would you expect to see for a SL to Reader promotion? I've had two post-doc carrying grants as PI, and been on two others as Co-I's. I've got 28 publications, 17 since being promoted to SL (and one more submitted). Do I really need that much more to go sideways? I figured one more PI-ship while continuing to publish papers at 2-3 per year would do. I guess I'm just a bit flabbergasted as I thought I was pretty close to Reader 5 years ago, and we still don't know if I would have made it, and to need so much more now seems hard to believe.
Although I also got a lot of useful advice and pointers to some people that I will contact to collaborate with. I left the meeting with my HoS and said how useful I'd found it; he replied by thanking me for taking things on board so calmly. I'm not even sure what to make of that -- I didn't think there was much to be calm (or excited) about! I even did tell them that I was going to come talk about promotion after I get my next grant, regardless.