Active discussions

Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Original poster

Hannah Waterman dumps her husband after losing weight

32 replies

belgo · 05/01/2010 11:26

here yes yes DM I know but I am looking for any excuse not to study or do the housework.

TBH I'd dump my dh if he called me 'Little Buddha'

OP posts:
Original poster
belgo · 05/01/2010 11:27

they looked so much happier in the before 'chubby' photo then in the after 'slimmed down' photo.

OP posts:
Original poster
belgo · 05/01/2010 11:32

Is it just me who is interested in reading this crap? Do I really have to go back to my studies?

OP posts:
GetOrfMoiLand · 05/01/2010 11:33

I think she is a sanctimonious faced cow, whether fat or thin.

She will probably pile all the weight on a la Natalie Cassidy in 6 months time, sell her story to Closer etc with suitable 'trauma' photos of how she starved herslef to lose the weight. Or summat.

GetOrfMoiLand · 05/01/2010 11:34

Oh no Belgo I am interested in all sorts of nonsense like this. And I am supoposed to be working!

MarkStretch · 05/01/2010 11:34

She really shouldn't wear a white bra under a black dress.

Original poster
belgo · 05/01/2010 11:36

Of course you're right Getorfmoiland! I don't think she'll be giving up the cheese and wine for long.

I did wonder why she wasn't on Stictly Come Dancing at all when Ricky Groves was dancing.

She needs to get rid of that fringe.

OP posts:
compo · 05/01/2010 11:37

they are both awful

I didn't like him on Strictly because I thougth he was arrogant - he thought he had the whole cheeky chappy thing all sewn up and the public loved him but it was actually Chris who was the real cheeky chappy
and there is nothing worse than a sanctimous person going on and on about their weight loss, funny how she doesn't act anymore just like Natalie Cassidy, just famous for their weightloss

BucharestYeMerryMNers · 05/01/2010 11:44

And Natalie cassidy is a size 12 like Dawn french is a size 16. My arse.

Tbh, I'd be far more worried if I were Mr hannah Waterman that she's obviously got some weird Daddy thing going on as the husband, is, in effect, Dennis 20 yrs younger. Both got that odd Boris Becker eyelash thing.

She'll be dancing-on-ice next year. Mark my words.....(or has she already done that?)

lambanana · 05/01/2010 11:53

look at the photos of her and lisa scott lee - airbrushed to fuck!

NomDePlume · 05/01/2010 11:56

she looks haggard now. Much older than the 34 years old she claims to be, imo.

NomDePlume · 05/01/2010 11:56

lisa scott lee makes me want to puke. What is the point of that woman ?

bluesuedepews · 05/01/2010 11:57

Her face looks totally different. She wasn't fat in EE and her face looked, well, normal.

Original poster
belgo · 05/01/2010 11:59

I suppose that's why she's got the fringe to cover up her haggard forehead? I agree, nothing much wrong with her figure before, at least nothing that couldn't be sorted by a decent control underwear.

OP posts:
Ronaldinhio · 05/01/2010 12:00

will she have him back when she piles all the weight back on?

Wiseoldelf · 05/01/2010 12:03

I can't believe she is only 34 nd he's 41. If anything I would have said it was the other way round.

SardineJam · 05/01/2010 12:06

Nomdeplume, totally agree with you. DP and I were commenting on how she looked younger before than she does now. My sister who is 41, who doesnt do the whole cleanse, tone, moisturise thing, looks younger than her.
Did have to laugh as the Sunday Mirror claimed she was 24!!! I'll be 24 on Thursday and certainly dont look anywhere near as haggard as she does!

missingtheaction · 05/01/2010 12:06

phwoah! if I had a personal trainer like that I might find the extra pounds falling off too, along with a few other items...

MadameCastafiore · 05/01/2010 12:09

Bag of spanners - that is DH's comment on how she looks now!

But she is rough - it is true that when you get to a certain age you have to choose between a bit of padding and your face still looking nice and being super thin and your face looking boney and haggered!

Pass the biscuits then!

Stroplet · 05/01/2010 12:34

Yes, the old face versus arse dilemma.

Couldn't see that one coming. A friend met her a couple of months ago on a drunken night out (she was still smoking and drinking then) and apparently not v nice. Told her all about her affair even though she'd never met my friend before.

Is it a coincidence that this story comes to light around the same time as her DVD is released?

Original poster
belgo · 05/01/2010 12:43

I've chosen face

OP posts:
GothDetective · 05/01/2010 12:52

She doesn't look a size 6 now, more like a 10. And on the dvd cover the after picture is very airbrushed and the before picture she looks bigger than a 16.

InThisSequinBraYesYouOlaJordan · 05/01/2010 13:42

She was NAILS on Come Dine With Me at Christmas - I have to say I've never "taken" to her, I do remember reading the Rula Lenska had a right old time with her when she was her stepmother - probably tosh, but I choose to believe it...

I like the comment on the DM site that this has always had a "Z-list storyline attached to it..." - that this was always the plan - put on the weight, lose the weight, put out the DVD, dump the husband... cynical but perhaps there's a grain of truth in it?

MissClavel · 05/01/2010 16:45

As she was in the year below me at school (briefly), and I'm 38, I'm not entirely convinced by her claim to be 34. She must have been doing some very clever slow ageing.

GetOrfMoiLand · 05/01/2010 18:04

Ooh I scampered out and bought Closer.

NO WAY is she a size 6 on he front of that DVD. She must have been airbrushed as well as her stomach would never look that flawless, surely however think she got she would have skin sag/tummy cellulite. Christ I have got both and I have never been a size 16

TheCrackFox · 05/01/2010 18:16

I refuse to believe that she is 34. MissClavel are you sure she wasn't a couple of years above you at school?