Angelina bf photo

[traceybath]

It is in the daily mail

but rather a lovely photo and i must say i'm not a fan of saint angelina generally

she's sitting back, too.

not all propped up on pillows so the norks are nice and forward for baby to take.

her legs are up.

i couldn't manage bf in bed unless the wall were flat smack behind me.

need lots of support, it's hard on your back at first.

now the photo of maggie gyllenhaal definitely for real and far better for bf image because her baby was about 8 months old in teh photograph.

Well, I haven't looked that gorgeous whilst breast feeding my Dd...it is a lovely photo.

I fed my children in a reclining position. So that doesn't mean she isn't.

I think it's a real pic.

don't think it's real at all.

i mean, why not show it? you don't see the nipple most of the time unless you've got big ass saggy tits with giant areolas like mine.

Me too pooka, I have fed reclined more often than not.

Some people are not inclined to show too much of themselves. I think it's very tasteful.

I'm a lazy moo and used to feed lying on my side, but it took me a while to work out how to do it!

I dont really care if it is a real picture or not, my issue is the wording on the article! I agree that high profile celebs breastfeeding their children would be a good think, but more during articles with the celeb, not in the DM and "astonishingly private moments" headlines!

for all we know she is simply holding a baby

yes, a woman who gave interviews with explicit details of her sex life, including the tatts she's got on her minge.

perezhilton blog reckons the bf will be inside the issue (typical US can't show it on the cover)

that was the boak, malory, to read that.

wonder how she had it altered, because it had billy bob's name on it.

nice.

I agree, may be a lot more pics inside the mag.

and of course she looks great post birth, she has several nannies dpesn't she?

I still think it normalises it in the sense of just having "breastfeeding" out there. it eing in mags, and being publicised.
she may not be a "normal" mum. but it is still putting it out there and it will still hav e an effect on some people.

she had the landing strip hair removed and had a tatt done there, by her own admission.

eeeew, why would anybody want a tattoo there?!

Well, I don't know anything about her, so don't know about her sex life chat. Some people find breast feeding more intimate than sunbathing topless and perhaps wouldn't want to show too much of themselves doing it.

she's covered in tatts, elf.

every now and again the press won't photoshop them out when she's seen in yet another slinky dress two seconds after giving birth.

i mean, she's half-French, i wouldn't think she had a problem with over-exposing herself .

I have a tattoo on my back, blimey, cannot imagine the pain getting a tattoo on the minge!

She's in a lovely position for breastfeeding.