Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

margegunderson · Today 16:21

IronEverything · Today 15:06

Seems like a big fat set up to me. Like there has been so much wrongdoing amongst celebrities and they just had to convict someone to make it look like something was being done. He was an easy target because of his vast sexual history.

Obviously I wasn't there for the trial so maybe I'd feel differently after hearing it all. But as it stands I don't think he's guilty. Not that my opinion means anything to anyone besides me so not sure why I'm being name called.

Show quote history

You do understand how jury trials work don’t you? So who is the “they” you believe made an example of this utter cocky-wock?

slug · Today 16:22

Having had several encounters with him in a professional context in the past I can confirm that he's not a man who takes well to being told "No". Esepcially by women.

Seajaye · Today 16:23

It will also be interesting to see how many more women come forward with civil claims for damages for distress mental health etc post criminal conviction, as the burden of proof is less in civil cases.

Boomer55 · Today 16:24

He’s has a result, being found not guilty of some things. 🤷‍♀️

PanteraRosa · Today 16:28

IronEverything · Today 15:46

Anti-vax for my family but don't care about what others do, anti-abortion and not interested in other people's education choices. I'm sure that's exactly what you needed to hear to make some sort of remark about me.

Anyway I wasn't expecting to derail the thread though so happy to leave it there.

Show quote history

Being anti-abortion plus giving rapists a pass is an unfortunate combination. Any suggestions for women pregnant as a result?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page