Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Thread gallery
17
BrandiedAromatics · Yesterday 18:08

likelysuspect · Yesterday 18:03

Im not sure what the relevance of this is, its not someones private business is it? He was at work yes?

It is relevant and it is in the public domain - Walliams took to litigation over this, also, for misuse of private information.

likelysuspect · Yesterday 18:46

Askandyforcompo · Yesterday 11:38

He did. Very long term too, years. He also had an affair with Imogen Thomas which the papers found out about. He wanted the injunction to stop that being printed because he didn't want his wife or sister in law to find out. The injunction failed because an MP used parliamentary privilege to reveal his name.

Of course it also meant that the children of these people had their parents love lives splashed all over the papers which must have been hideous for them.

Ah well, at least the public's curiousity was satisfied

likelysuspect · Yesterday 18:47

BrandiedAromatics · Yesterday 18:08

It is relevant and it is in the public domain - Walliams took to litigation over this, also, for misuse of private information.

Talking about things at work and that being disclosed, is far far removed from someone wanting to talk about an affair they had, or whether their spouse had an affair

So what is the relevance of asking me the question in the first place, its not the same at all.

BrandiedAromatics · Yesterday 19:02

likelysuspect · Yesterday 18:47

Talking about things at work and that being disclosed, is far far removed from someone wanting to talk about an affair they had, or whether their spouse had an affair

So what is the relevance of asking me the question in the first place, its not the same at all.

Because as well as being litigious the accuser also said the company caused him psychiatric harm. So although he did say those things, revealing he said those things caused him mental health problems. This thread is about someone like that.

Katrinawaves · Yesterday 20:39

Judgment is being handed down tomorrow

likelysuspect · Yesterday 20:43

BrandiedAromatics · Yesterday 19:02

Because as well as being litigious the accuser also said the company caused him psychiatric harm. So although he did say those things, revealing he said those things caused him mental health problems. This thread is about someone like that.

Your question was in response to me saying that someones private business is private business

Their work is not private business, they are at work

So I asked you what the relevance of the question was in relation to my comment talking about someones private business

You dont seem to be able to follow the conversation and its exhausting explaining all this to you, read the thread.

LillyPeacePlant · Yesterday 20:52

GarlicEverything · Yesterday 14:06

I didn't realise Walliams had such a habit of pulling other men's trousers down on stage Confused I've seen the Mark Ronson clip, but it turns out he's done it loads!

The routine begins with Walliams asking a volunteer to come up onto the stage and getting them to confirm their age.

When one answers 16, the controversial comedian says, 'Bingo', before adding: 'You're a big boy for 16 aren't you – that's what I'll tell the judge.'

He then kisses the boy on the lips before playing his game of 'hide the sausage', which involves him lunging for their trousers, dry humping them and leaving them with exposed buttocks and grappling to keep their genitals covered.

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-8524613/Video-David-Walliams-humiliating-young-men-pulling-pants-stage.html

Eurgh! What an absolute pig.

likelysuspect · Yesterday 23:04

Has Mark Ronson ever spoken about this?

Moddingcrowd · Today 10:30

.

Injunction against ITN by a well known individual?
DuncinToffee · Today 11:30

More info

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx8dznljndyzo
The World of David Walliams attraction at Alton Towers has permanently closed, the theme park has announced.

PinkCalligraphy · Today 13:12

DuncinToffee · Today 11:30

More info

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx8dznljndyzo
The World of David Walliams attraction at Alton Towers has permanently closed, the theme park has announced.

What a very strange and completely random and unrelated decision*

(*Said nobody....)

Lalgarh · Today 13:19

Katrinawaves · Yesterday 20:39

Judgment is being handed down tomorrow

Nothing so far

Edited to add link

https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/high-court-to-decide-on-celebs-risk-to-life-anonymity-injunction/5128413.article

placemats · Today 13:22

The judgement is to be given after 2pm today.

jonesonscam · Today 13:30

2pm

MrsRobinsonsHandprints · Today 13:38

PinkCalligraphy · Today 13:12

What a very strange and completely random and unrelated decision*

(*Said nobody....)

Indeed.

I am surprised it was reported before the judgement.

I am surprised that this thread hasn't been deleted.

I am waiting on 2pm

bobiwien · Today 13:38

Can’t wait

AlonsoMosley · Today 13:42

Me too.

See what I did there?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread