Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

48% of Britain's would refuse to fight for their country

226 replies

cakeorwine · 15/10/2026 08:30

So a new headline today

Daily Telegraph
Half of Britons would refuse to fight for their country

Half of Britons say there are no circumstances in which they would go to war for their country, a poll has found.

While the pollster Ipsos found strong backing for increased defence spending, some 48 per cent said there was no situation in which they would take up arms.

One in two Britons would never fight for their country | Politics | News | Express.co.uk

It was not that easy to find the data set but I've linked it below and shown the data from the question

Original data here

Despite rising support for increasing defence spending, half of Britons say there are no circumstances under which they would take up arms for Britain | Ipsos

War-trends-final-weighted

Would be interested to hear your opinion on the survey results

As would Sir Humphrey

48% of Britain's would refuse to fight for their country
48% of Britain's would refuse to fight for their country
48% of Britain's would refuse to fight for their country
OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
TeenLifeMum · 15/10/2026 13:35

LeedsLoiner · 15/10/2026 13:13

If we have another Covid it won't work though. Most of stayed at home, wore masks, and followed the rules - then we found out that the person who was in charge of the country wasn't.
You'll never get that level of compliance again.

I agree but circumstances would be very different and I think it’s easy to say how you’d behave but reality is very different

godmum56 · 15/10/2026 13:35

cakeorwine · 15/10/2026 13:08

Just one would do

ok
"would you go to war if your city was bombed?"

anotherside · 15/10/2026 13:39

The vast majority of past European conflicts featured men who were either conscripted to fight (ie no choice in the matter) or were paid a decent enough wage to fight for some king or other to make the possibility of getting stabbed still appear sufficiently attractive (as life for the normal person was rough as shit anyway)

Without heaviliy factoring in those two scenarios, the question is vague to the point of being meaningless.

DorsetKnobBiscuit · 15/10/2026 13:41

1dayatatime · 15/10/2026 10:19

Different competing or parallel cultures with unshared values, norms, and behaviors, aka multi culturalism.

As opposed to a unified civic identity, shared language, respect for British laws and institutions, and a commitment to the country above ethnic or religious ties.

Why is it called a "nation on strangers"?

JuliaAgrippina · 15/10/2026 13:42

HedgerowD · 15/10/2026 13:32

Thats the case with any study though, a significant proportion the population doesn't have the fundamental literacy and numeracy skills to interpret data for themselves.

This.

I took a quick look nothing stood out as particularly egregious - and I'm on here for entertainment between boring tasks today rather an indepth analysis on topics.

ThatMrsM · 15/10/2026 13:46

cakeorwine · 15/10/2026 13:27

What about defending our country against invasion?

Or defending your homeland against an aggressor?

I changed country to homeland. More emotional

Perhaps some people answered that they wouldn't be willing to take up arms because they physically can't, rather than because they wouldn't want to defend their country during a war. You might get a higher number willing to support if the question wasn't only about fighting (which is why I suggested including non-combat roles).

RaggedRocks · 15/10/2026 13:46

EvilNextDoor · 15/10/2026 13:30

No fucking chance would my husband or children be fighting for this country. Husband is too old now and my children are probably just a smidge too young.

I wouldn’t fight to defend this country either but I would happily put anyone down who tried to hurt my family.

Were you born here?

RaggedRocks · 15/10/2026 13:49

I wouldn't be any use in the front line, but I would help on the home front.

cakeorwine · 15/10/2026 13:50

godmum56 · 15/10/2026 13:35

ok
"would you go to war if your city was bombed?"

Interesting question for Prime Ministers

At what point do you go to war

Salami tactics

OP posts:
anotherside · 15/10/2026 13:50

RaggedRocks · 15/10/2026 13:22

Too so many people, this country is just real estate. Somewhere to work or claim benefits. Patriotism is dead. They need to give servicemen and women priority to social housing. Then emergency services and other health workers.

I wouldn’t say it’s dead but many thankfully most people nowadays are educated enough to have a more nuanced understanding of the word.

Dappy777 · 15/10/2026 13:54

My great grandfather was wounded in WW1 (I have his letters) and my grandfather joined the RAF after Dunkirk. But if there was a war tomorrow, I wouldn't lift the little toe on my right foot. I don't even feel British anymore.

All my life I have been told how disgusting and shameful our history is. The left have taught us to hate ourselves and reject our own culture (Radio 4 can't even mention Jane Austen without linking her to colonialism). I am often struck by the patriotism of other nationalities. I mean how secure they are in their identity, how they celebrate their history and culture.

On top of that, mass immigration has transformed Britain. At times, I feel like a hated outsider. Who is going to die for a country in which it's controversial even to flag your national flag?! You think I'm going to fight to protect smashed statues and 'de-colonised' libraries? The left have won. They've created a new Britain, and they can go and fight for it.

Wearedoomed · 15/10/2026 13:55

I’m not surprised. It’s clear to most that we’re not all ‘in this’ together, and the same sacrifices wouldn’t be demanded from everyone. People caught onto the fact a long time ago that some people are more likely to be considered cannon fodder than others. That said, if an invading army were marching down the street, I suspect most would defend their family, and if conscription was brought in for a fight further afield, I doubt 52% of the eligible population would choose prison and the attendant social opprobrium. I’m too old to be conscripted, and I would struggle to enthusiastically sign up to risk death, but if it came to it, I’d accept having to do it were conscription brought in (I’d be shit at it though - terrible hand-eye coordination and no capacity for blind obedience).

EvilNextDoor · 15/10/2026 14:00

RaggedRocks · 15/10/2026 13:46

Were you born here?

Yes

Not sure how that is relevant

EasternStandard · 15/10/2026 14:03

RaggedRocks · 15/10/2026 13:49

I wouldn't be any use in the front line, but I would help on the home front.

I don’t think use is as much of a factor with drone warfare anyway. It’s just numbers and awful to see.

RaggedRocks · 15/10/2026 14:24

EasternStandard · 15/10/2026 14:03

I don’t think use is as much of a factor with drone warfare anyway. It’s just numbers and awful to see.

I would be up for controlling a drone - more fun than doom-scrolling.

Growlybear83 · 15/10/2026 14:29

LeedsLoiner · 15/10/2026 13:20

No they didn't - they had plans to mobilise the Territorial Army and reserves which would have been sent to fulfil the UK's NATO commitments in Germany - at that point the UK had a massive number of troops in Germany in case of the Cold War getting hot - which would have released regular army units to be sent to the Falklands.

My late father in law worked on the conscription plans during the Falklands war, which included ordinary British citizens.

KnickerlessParsons · 15/10/2026 14:34

I would think that almost 100% would find they have no choice. If they are called up it’s likely prison if they refuse (not that we have enough prison centres). Baring reserved occupations, illness and disability serving your country on a military basis may be compulsory.

LeedsLoiner · 15/10/2026 14:41

Before any form of conscription was introduced there would need to be a massive programme of building barracks, training centres, etc. not to mention the procurement of thousands of weapons from rifles and machine guns to tanks, drones, aircraft and naval ships, not to mention ammunition, new uniforms, boots, NBC equipment, etc. before you could even let the first batch be called up.
Even if a government wanted to bring it in it would take years to roll it out.

EasternStandard · 15/10/2026 14:42

RaggedRocks · 15/10/2026 14:24

I would be up for controlling a drone - more fun than doom-scrolling.

Sadly not everyone is controlling they’re on the receiving end.

godmum56 · 15/10/2026 14:43

cakeorwine · 15/10/2026 13:50

Interesting question for Prime Ministers

At what point do you go to war

Salami tactics

Yes I remember this.

FlyingApple · 15/10/2026 15:46

RaggedRocks · 15/10/2026 14:24

I would be up for controlling a drone - more fun than doom-scrolling.

You honestly would be up for that? Knowing what you just did killed people? This isn't goady, I just don't understand it.

silverbirches · 15/10/2026 16:09

I quite like a conversation, but what I don't really like is having to read through acres of information on a variety of links first. Unless the thread itself contains the pertinent details which are under discussion, then I really can't be arsed. Sorry.

Greenseawitch · 15/10/2026 16:11

I think this is linked to:

  • a total lack of trust in and respect for politicians
  • people who feel like they have no reason to fight because these days it is so hard to have a decent living, buy a house and afford to have a family so they don't really have anything they would want to protect
  • capitalism is pushing a formula where individuality is praised and money is everything. That does not lead to community cohesion and people who want to support each other.

Why would young people especially want to potentially give their lives for the country in that context?

cakeorwine · 15/10/2026 16:43

silverbirches · 15/10/2026 16:09

I quite like a conversation, but what I don't really like is having to read through acres of information on a variety of links first. Unless the thread itself contains the pertinent details which are under discussion, then I really can't be arsed. Sorry.

Do you believe it's good practice to look at at least the basics of a survey before responding to it with an opinion based on the reported media result?

OP posts: